Model Comparison

Claude Opus 4.5 vs Gemma 3n E4B InstructedWhich is better in 2026?

Claude Opus 4.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Claude Opus 4.5 is 2.5x cheaper per token.

Verdict: Claude Opus 4.5 vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed — which is better?

Claude Opus 4.5 (by Anthropic) and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed (by Google) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Claude Opus 4.5 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is better at 0 benchmarks. Claude Opus 4.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

On price, Claude Opus 4.5 is roughly 2.5x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Claude Opus 4.5 also accepts a larger context window (200,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose Claude Opus 4.5 if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks
  • cost matters — it's about 2.5x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 200,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2025

Choose Gemma 3n E4B Instructed if…

  • you want predictable pricing at $20.00/M input and $40.00/M output
Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

Claude Opus 4.5 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude Opus 4.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Jun 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Claude Opus 4.5 costs less

For input processing, Claude Opus 4.5 ($5.00/1M tokens) is 4.0x cheaper than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed ($20.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude Opus 4.5 ($25.00/1M tokens) is 1.6x cheaper than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed ($40.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is more expensive than Claude Opus 4.5.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sun Jun 07 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.5
Input tokens$5.00
Output tokens$25.00
Best providerAnthropic
Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Input tokens$20.00
Output tokens$40.00
Best providerTogether
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Claude Opus 4.5 accepts 200,000 input tokens compared to Gemma 3n E4B Instructed's 32,000 tokens. Claude Opus 4.5 can generate longer responses up to 64,000 tokens, while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is limited to 32,000 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.5
Input200,000 tokens
Output64,000 tokens
Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Input32,000 tokens
Output32,000 tokens
Sun Jun 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Claude Opus 4.5 and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude Opus 4.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude Opus 4.5

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Opus 4.5 was released on 2025-11-24, while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed was released on 2025-06-26.

Claude Opus 4.5 is 5 months newer than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed.

Claude Opus 4.5

Nov 24, 2025

6 months ago

5mo newer
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Jun 26, 2025

11 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Claude Opus 4.5 has a knowledge cutoff of 2025-03-31, while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed has a cutoff of 2024-06-01.

Claude Opus 4.5 has more recent training data (up to 2025-03-31), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Gemma 3n E4B Instructed (2024-06-01).

Claude Opus 4.5

Mar 2025

9 mo newer
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Jun 2024

Provider Availability

Claude Opus 4.5 is available from Anthropic. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is available from Together.

Claude Opus 4.5

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $5.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $25.00/1M

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $20.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $40.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Anthropic
Larger context window (200,000 tokens)
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Higher GPQA score (87.0% vs 23.7%)
Google

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.5
Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Opus 4.5 vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed.

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.5 or Gemma 3n E4B Instructed?

Claude Opus 4.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Claude Opus 4.5 is made by Anthropic and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Claude Opus 4.5 compare to Gemma 3n E4B Instructed in benchmarks?

Claude Opus 4.5 scores Tau2 Telecom: 98.2%, MMMLU: 90.8%, Tau2 Retail: 88.9%, GPQA: 87.0%, SWE-Bench Verified: 80.9%. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed scores HumanEval: 75.0%, MGSM: 67.0%, MMLU: 64.9%, Global-MMLU-Lite: 64.5%, MBPP: 63.6%.

Is Claude Opus 4.5 cheaper than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed?

Claude Opus 4.5 is 4.0x cheaper for input tokens. Claude Opus 4.5 costs $5.00/M input and $25.00/M output via anthropic. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed costs $20.00/M input and $40.00/M output via together.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Opus 4.5 and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed?

Claude Opus 4.5 supports 200K tokens and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed supports 32K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Opus 4.5 and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed?

Key differences include context window (200K vs 32K), input pricing ($5.00 vs $20.00/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Opus 4.5 and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed?

Claude Opus 4.5 is developed by Anthropic and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is developed by Google.

Related comparisons