The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads the LLM Stats Score 29.9 to -4.7. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is 29.4x cheaper per token.

Google · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads the overall LLM Stats Score 29.9 to -4.7, ranking #123 overall.

On price, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is roughly 29.4x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

  • overall performance matters — it scores 29.9 and ranks #123 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • cost matters — it's about 29.4x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2026

Choose Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

  • you want predictable pricing at $20.00/M input and $40.00/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Google
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
29.9
#123
-4.7
#349
Reasoning
25.9
#148
-5.5
#348
Coding
16.0
#127
-0.1
#241
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.30 / M
$20.00 / M
Output price
$2.50 / M
$40.00 / M
Context window
1,048,576
32,000

Individual benchmarks

6 reported for Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite · 18 for Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and Gemma 3n E4B Instructeddon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite costs less

For input processing, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite ($0.30/1M tokens) is 66.7x cheaper than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed ($20.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite ($2.50/1M tokens) is 16.0x cheaper than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed ($40.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is more expensive than Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sun Sep 13 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Input tokens$0.30
Output tokens$2.50
Best providerGoogle
Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Input tokens$20.00
Output tokens$40.00
Best providerTogether
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Gemma 3n E4B Instructed's 32,000 tokens. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite can generate longer responses up to 65,536 tokens, while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is limited to 32,000 tokens.

Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Input32,000 tokens
Output32,000 tokens
Sun Sep 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite was released on 2026-07-21, while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed was released on 2025-06-26.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is 13 months newer than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Jul 21, 2026

1 months ago

1.1yr newer
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Jun 26, 2025

1.2 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite has a knowledge cutoff of 2026-03-31, while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed has a cutoff of 2024-06-01.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite has more recent training data (up to 2026-03-31), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Gemma 3n E4B Instructed (2024-06-01).

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Mar 2026

1.8 yr newer
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Jun 2024

Provider Availability

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is available from Google. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is available from Together.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.50/1M

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $20.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $40.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
✓ Preferred
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed.

Which is better, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite or Gemma 3n E4B Instructed?

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads the LLM Stats Score 29.9 to -4.7. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is made by Google and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite compare to Gemma 3n E4B Instructed in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite scores CharXiv-R: 76.5%, OSWorld-Verified: 74.0%, SWE-Bench Pro: 54.2%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 54.0%, MLE-Bench: 39.2%. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed scores HumanEval: 75.0%, MGSM: 67.0%, MMLU: 64.9%, Global-MMLU-Lite: 64.5%, MBPP: 63.6%.

Is Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite cheaper than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed?

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is 66.7x cheaper for input tokens. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite costs $0.30/M input and $2.50/M output via google. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed costs $20.00/M input and $40.00/M output via together.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed?

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite supports 1.0M tokens and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed supports 32K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (29.9 vs -4.7), context window (1.0M vs 32K), input pricing ($0.30 vs $20.00/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Related comparisons