Model Comparison

Claude Opus 4.5 vs GLM-5V-TurboWhich is better in 2026?

Claude Opus 4.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. GLM-5V-Turbo is 5.3x cheaper per token.

Verdict: Claude Opus 4.5 vs GLM-5V-Turbo — which is better?

Claude Opus 4.5 (by Anthropic) and GLM-5V-Turbo (by Zhipu AI) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Claude Opus 4.5 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (OSWorld), while GLM-5V-Turbo is better at 0 benchmarks. Claude Opus 4.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

On price, GLM-5V-Turbo is roughly 5.3x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Choose Claude Opus 4.5 if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks

Choose GLM-5V-Turbo if…

  • cost matters — it's about 5.3x cheaper per token
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Apr 2026

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

Claude Opus 4.5 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (OSWorld), while GLM-5V-Turbo is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude Opus 4.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Jul 05 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

GLM-5V-Turbo costs less

For input processing, Claude Opus 4.5 ($5.00/1M tokens) is 4.2x more expensive than GLM-5V-Turbo ($1.20/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude Opus 4.5 ($25.00/1M tokens) is 6.3x more expensive than GLM-5V-Turbo ($4.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude Opus 4.5 is more expensive than GLM-5V-Turbo.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sun Jul 05 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.5
Input tokens$5.00
Output tokens$25.00
Best providerAnthropic
Zhipu AI
GLM-5V-Turbo
Input tokens$1.20
Output tokens$4.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Both models have the same input context window of 200,000 tokens. GLM-5V-Turbo can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while Claude Opus 4.5 is limited to 64,000 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.5
Input200,000 tokens
Output64,000 tokens
Zhipu AI
GLM-5V-Turbo
Input200,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Sun Jul 05 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Claude Opus 4.5 and GLM-5V-Turbo support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude Opus 4.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GLM-5V-Turbo

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude Opus 4.5

Proprietary

Closed source

GLM-5V-Turbo

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Opus 4.5 was released on 2025-11-24, while GLM-5V-Turbo was released on 2026-04-02.

GLM-5V-Turbo is 4 months newer than Claude Opus 4.5.

Claude Opus 4.5

Nov 24, 2025

7 months ago

GLM-5V-Turbo

Apr 2, 2026

3 months ago

4mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Claude Opus 4.5 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-03-31, while GLM-5V-Turbo's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Claude Opus 4.5's training data extends to 2025-03-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without GLM-5V-Turbo's cutoff date.

Claude Opus 4.5

Mar 2025

GLM-5V-Turbo

Provider Availability

Claude Opus 4.5 is available from Anthropic. GLM-5V-Turbo is available from ZAI.

Claude Opus 4.5

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $5.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $25.00/1M

GLM-5V-Turbo

z logo
Unknown Organization
Input Price:Input: $1.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Higher OSWorld score (66.3% vs 62.3%)
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude Opus 4.5 and GLM-5V-Turbo side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude Opus 4.5
✓ Preferred
GLM-5V-Turbo
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.5
Zhipu AI
GLM-5V-Turbo

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Opus 4.5 vs GLM-5V-Turbo.

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.5 or GLM-5V-Turbo?

Claude Opus 4.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Claude Opus 4.5 is made by Anthropic and GLM-5V-Turbo is made by Zhipu AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Claude Opus 4.5 compare to GLM-5V-Turbo in benchmarks?

Claude Opus 4.5 scores Tau2 Telecom: 98.2%, MMMLU: 90.8%, Tau2 Retail: 88.9%, GPQA: 87.0%, SWE-Bench Verified: 80.9%. GLM-5V-Turbo scores Design2Code: 94.8%, Flame-VLM-Code: 93.8%, V*: 89.0%, WebVoyager: 88.5%, PinchBench: 80.7%.

Is Claude Opus 4.5 cheaper than GLM-5V-Turbo?

GLM-5V-Turbo is 4.2x cheaper for input tokens. Claude Opus 4.5 costs $5.00/M input and $25.00/M output via anthropic. GLM-5V-Turbo costs $1.20/M input and $4.00/M output via z.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Opus 4.5 and GLM-5V-Turbo?

Claude Opus 4.5 supports 200K tokens and GLM-5V-Turbo supports 200K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Opus 4.5 and GLM-5V-Turbo?

Key differences include input pricing ($5.00 vs $1.20/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Opus 4.5 and GLM-5V-Turbo?

Claude Opus 4.5 is developed by Anthropic and GLM-5V-Turbo is developed by Zhipu AI.