Model Comparison

Claude Opus 4.5 vs GPT Image 2Which is better in 2026?

Comparing Claude Opus 4.5 and GPT Image 2 across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Verdict: Claude Opus 4.5 vs GPT Image 2 — which is better?

Claude Opus 4.5 (by Anthropic) and GPT Image 2 (by OpenAI) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

On price, Claude Opus 4.5 is roughly 1.1x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Choose Claude Opus 4.5 if…

  • cost matters — it's about 1.1x cheaper per token

Choose GPT Image 2 if…

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Apr 2026
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.5
OpenAI
GPT Image 2

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Opus 4.5 vs GPT Image 2.

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.5 or GPT Image 2?

Claude Opus 4.5 (Anthropic) and GPT Image 2 (OpenAI) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Claude Opus 4.5 compare to GPT Image 2 in benchmarks?

Claude Opus 4.5 scores Tau2 Telecom: 98.2%, MMMLU: 90.8%, Tau2 Retail: 88.9%, GPQA: 87.0%, SWE-Bench Verified: 80.9%.

Is Claude Opus 4.5 cheaper than GPT Image 2?

Both models cost $5.00 per million input tokens.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Opus 4.5 and GPT Image 2?

Claude Opus 4.5 supports 200K tokens and GPT Image 2 supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

Who makes Claude Opus 4.5 and GPT Image 2?

Claude Opus 4.5 is developed by Anthropic and GPT Image 2 is developed by OpenAI.

Related comparisons