GLM-5 vs Claude Opus 4.5 Comparison

Comparing GLM-5 and Claude Opus 4.5 across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

GLM-5 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (MCP Atlas), while Claude Opus 4.5 is better at 2 benchmarks (SWE-Bench Verified, Terminal-Bench 2.0).

Claude Opus 4.5 shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Tue Mar 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

GLM-5 costs less

For input processing, GLM-5 ($1.00/1M tokens) is 5.0x cheaper than Claude Opus 4.5 ($5.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, GLM-5 ($3.20/1M tokens) is 7.8x cheaper than Claude Opus 4.5 ($25.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude Opus 4.5 is more expensive than GLM-5.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Mar 17 2026 • llm-stats.com
Zhipu AI
GLM-5
Input tokens$1.00
Output tokens$3.20
Best providerUnknown Organization
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.5
Input tokens$5.00
Output tokens$25.00
Best providerAnthropic
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Both models have the same input context window of 200,000 tokens. GLM-5 can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while Claude Opus 4.5 is limited to 64,000 tokens.

Zhipu AI
GLM-5
Input200,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.5
Input200,000 tokens
Output64,000 tokens
Tue Mar 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Claude Opus 4.5 supports multimodal inputs, whereas GLM-5 does not.

Claude Opus 4.5 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

GLM-5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Claude Opus 4.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

GLM-5 is licensed under MIT, while Claude Opus 4.5 uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

GLM-5

MIT

Open weights

Claude Opus 4.5

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GLM-5 was released on 2026-02-11, while Claude Opus 4.5 was released on 2025-11-24.

GLM-5 is 3 months newer than Claude Opus 4.5.

GLM-5

Feb 11, 2026

1 months ago

2mo newer
Claude Opus 4.5

Nov 24, 2025

3 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Claude Opus 4.5 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-03-31, while GLM-5's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Claude Opus 4.5's training data extends to 2025-03-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without GLM-5's cutoff date.

GLM-5

Claude Opus 4.5

Mar 2025

Provider Availability

GLM-5 is available from ZAI. Claude Opus 4.5 is available from Anthropic. The availability of providers can affect quality of the model and reliability.

GLM-5

z logo
Unknown Organization
Input Price:Input: $1.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.20/1M

Claude Opus 4.5

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $5.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $25.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights
Higher MCP Atlas score (67.8% vs 62.3%)
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (80.9% vs 77.8%)
Higher Terminal-Bench 2.0 score (59.3% vs 56.2%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Zhipu AI
GLM-5
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.5