Model Comparison

Claude Opus 4.5 vs Qwen3-Coder

Comparing Claude Opus 4.5 and Qwen3-Coder across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Claude Opus 4.5 and Qwen3-Coder don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3-Coder costs less

For input processing, Claude Opus 4.5 ($5.00/1M tokens) is 27.8x more expensive than Qwen3-Coder ($0.18/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude Opus 4.5 ($25.00/1M tokens) is 138.9x more expensive than Qwen3-Coder ($0.18/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude Opus 4.5 is more expensive than Qwen3-Coder.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers

Thu May 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Claude Opus 4.5

Input tokens$5.00

Output tokens$25.00

Best providerAnthropic

Qwen3-Coder

Input tokens$0.18

Output tokens$0.18

Best providerDeepinfra

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Qwen3-Coder accepts 256,000 input tokens compared to Claude Opus 4.5's 200,000 tokens. Qwen3-Coder can generate longer responses up to 256,000 tokens, while Claude Opus 4.5 is limited to 64,000 tokens.

Claude Opus 4.5

Input200,000 tokens

Output64,000 tokens

Qwen3-Coder

Input256,000 tokens

Output256,000 tokens

Thu May 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Claude Opus 4.5 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen3-Coder does not.

Claude Opus 4.5 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude Opus 4.5

Text

Images

Audio

Video

Qwen3-Coder

Text

Images

Audio

Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude Opus 4.5 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3-Coder uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude Opus 4.5

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3-Coder

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Opus 4.5 was released on 2025-11-24, while Qwen3-Coder was released on 2025-01-01.

Claude Opus 4.5 is 11 months newer than Qwen3-Coder.

Claude Opus 4.5

Nov 24, 2025

5 months ago

10mo newer

Qwen3-Coder

Jan 1, 2025

1.4 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Claude Opus 4.5 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-03-31, while Qwen3-Coder's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Claude Opus 4.5's training data extends to 2025-03-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3-Coder's cutoff date.

Claude Opus 4.5

Mar 2025

Qwen3-Coder

—

Provider Availability

Claude Opus 4.5 is available from Anthropic. Qwen3-Coder is available from DeepInfra, Fireworks.

Claude Opus 4.5

Anthropic

Input Price:Input: $5.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $25.00/1M

Qwen3-Coder

Deepinfra

Input Price:Input: $0.18/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.18/1M

Fireworks

Input Price:Input: $0.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.25/1M

* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Claude Opus 4.5

View details

Anthropic

Supports multimodal inputs

Qwen3-Coder

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Larger context window (256,000 tokens)

Less expensive input tokens

Less expensive output tokens

Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature	Claude Opus 4.5	Qwen3-Coder

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Opus 4.5 vs Qwen3-Coder.

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.5 or Qwen3-Coder?

Claude Opus 4.5 (Anthropic) and Qwen3-Coder (Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Claude Opus 4.5 compare to Qwen3-Coder in benchmarks?

Claude Opus 4.5 scores Tau2 Telecom: 98.2%, MMMLU: 90.8%, Tau2 Retail: 88.9%, GPQA: 87.0%, SWE-Bench Verified: 80.9%.

Is Claude Opus 4.5 cheaper than Qwen3-Coder?

Qwen3-Coder is 27.8x cheaper for input tokens. Claude Opus 4.5 costs $5.00/M input and $25.00/M output via anthropic. Qwen3-Coder costs $0.18/M input and $0.18/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Opus 4.5 and Qwen3-Coder?

Claude Opus 4.5 supports 200K tokens and Qwen3-Coder supports 256K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Opus 4.5 and Qwen3-Coder?

Key differences include context window (200K vs 256K), input pricing ($5.00 vs $0.18/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Opus 4.5 and Qwen3-Coder?

Claude Opus 4.5 is developed by Anthropic and Qwen3-Coder is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.