Claude Opus 4.5 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B Comparison

Comparing Claude Opus 4.5 and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

Claude Opus 4.5 outperforms in 4 benchmarks (GPQA, MMMLU, SWE-Bench Verified, Terminal-Bench 2.0), while Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude Opus 4.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Mar 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B costs less

For input processing, Claude Opus 4.5 ($5.00/1M tokens) is 12.5x more expensive than Qwen3.5-122B-A10B ($0.40/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude Opus 4.5 ($25.00/1M tokens) is 7.8x more expensive than Qwen3.5-122B-A10B ($3.20/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude Opus 4.5 is more expensive than Qwen3.5-122B-A10B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Mar 17 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.5
Input tokens$5.00
Output tokens$25.00
Best providerAnthropic
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
Input tokens$0.40
Output tokens$3.20
Best providerNovita
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B accepts 262,144 input tokens compared to Claude Opus 4.5's 200,000 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 64,000 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.5
Input200,000 tokens
Output64,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
Input262,144 tokens
Output64,000 tokens
Tue Mar 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Claude Opus 4.5 and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude Opus 4.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude Opus 4.5 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3.5-122B-A10B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude Opus 4.5

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Opus 4.5 was released on 2025-11-24, while Qwen3.5-122B-A10B was released on 2026-02-24.

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is 3 months newer than Claude Opus 4.5.

Claude Opus 4.5

Nov 24, 2025

3 months ago

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Feb 24, 2026

3 weeks ago

3mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Claude Opus 4.5 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-03-31, while Qwen3.5-122B-A10B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Claude Opus 4.5's training data extends to 2025-03-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3.5-122B-A10B's cutoff date.

Claude Opus 4.5

Mar 2025

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Provider Availability

Claude Opus 4.5 is available from Anthropic. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is available from Novita. The availability of providers can affect quality of the model and reliability.

Claude Opus 4.5

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $5.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $25.00/1M

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.20/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Higher GPQA score (87.0% vs 86.6%)
Higher MMMLU score (90.8% vs 86.7%)
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (80.9% vs 72.0%)
Higher Terminal-Bench 2.0 score (59.3% vs 49.4%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Larger context window (262,144 tokens)
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.5
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B