Model Comparison

Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6

Claude Opus 4.6 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Claude Sonnet 4.6 is 1.7x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

14 benchmarks

Claude Opus 4.6 outperforms in 11 benchmarks (ARC-AGI v2, BrowseComp, GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, MMMLU, MMMU-Pro, OSWorld, SWE-Bench Verified, Tau2 Retail, Tau2 Telecom, Terminal-Bench 2.0), while Claude Sonnet 4.6 is better at 3 benchmarks (Finance Agent, GDPval-AA, MCP Atlas).

Claude Opus 4.6 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Apr 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Claude Sonnet 4.6 costs less

For input processing, Claude Opus 4.6 ($5.00/1M tokens) is 1.7x more expensive than Claude Sonnet 4.6 ($3.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude Opus 4.6 ($25.00/1M tokens) is 1.7x more expensive than Claude Sonnet 4.6 ($15.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude Opus 4.6 is more expensive than Claude Sonnet 4.6.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Apr 07 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6
Input tokens$5.00
Output tokens$25.00
Best providerAnthropic
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Input tokens$3.00
Output tokens$15.00
Best providerAnthropic
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Claude Opus 4.6 accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to Claude Sonnet 4.6's 200,000 tokens. Claude Opus 4.6 can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while Claude Sonnet 4.6 is limited to 64,000 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Input200,000 tokens
Output64,000 tokens
Tue Apr 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Claude Opus 4.6 and Claude Sonnet 4.6 support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude Opus 4.6

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Claude Sonnet 4.6

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude Opus 4.6

Proprietary

Closed source

Claude Sonnet 4.6

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Opus 4.6 was released on 2026-02-05, while Claude Sonnet 4.6 was released on 2026-02-17.

Claude Sonnet 4.6 is 0 month newer than Claude Opus 4.6.

Claude Opus 4.6

Feb 5, 2026

2 months ago

Claude Sonnet 4.6

Feb 17, 2026

1 months ago

1w newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Claude Opus 4.6 is available from Anthropic. Claude Sonnet 4.6 is available from Anthropic.

Claude Opus 4.6

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $5.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $25.00/1M

Claude Sonnet 4.6

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Anthropic
Larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)
Higher ARC-AGI v2 score (68.8% vs 58.3%)
Higher BrowseComp score (84.0% vs 74.7%)
Higher GPQA score (91.3% vs 89.9%)
Higher Humanity's Last Exam score (53.1% vs 49.0%)
Higher MMMLU score (91.1% vs 89.3%)
Higher MMMU-Pro score (77.3% vs 75.6%)
Higher OSWorld score (72.7% vs 72.5%)
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (80.8% vs 79.6%)
Higher Tau2 Retail score (91.9% vs 91.7%)
Higher Tau2 Telecom score (99.3% vs 97.9%)
Higher Terminal-Bench 2.0 score (65.4% vs 59.1%)
Anthropic
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Higher Finance Agent score (63.3% vs 60.7%)
Higher GDPval-AA score (54.4% vs 53.5%)
Higher MCP Atlas score (61.3% vs 59.5%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.6

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6

Claude Opus 4.6 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Claude Opus 4.6 is made by Anthropic and Claude Sonnet 4.6 is made by Anthropic. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Claude Opus 4.6 scores Vending-Bench 2: 100.0%, AIME 2025: 99.8%, Tau2 Telecom: 99.3%, Graphwalks parents >128k: 95.4%, MRCR v2 (8-needle): 93.0%. Claude Sonnet 4.6 scores Tau2 Telecom: 97.9%, Tau2 Retail: 91.7%, GPQA: 89.9%, MMMLU: 89.3%, SWE-Bench Verified: 79.6%.
Claude Sonnet 4.6 is 1.7x cheaper for input tokens. Claude Opus 4.6 costs $5.00/M input and $25.00/M output via anthropic. Claude Sonnet 4.6 costs $3.00/M input and $15.00/M output via anthropic.
Claude Opus 4.6 supports 1.0M tokens and Claude Sonnet 4.6 supports 200K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 200K), input pricing ($5.00 vs $3.00/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.