Model Comparison
Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Sonnet 5Which is better in 2026?
Claude Sonnet 5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Claude Sonnet 5 is 1.7x cheaper per token.
Verdict: Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Sonnet 5 — which is better?
Claude Opus 4.6 (by Anthropic) and Claude Sonnet 5 (by Anthropic) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.
Claude Opus 4.6 outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Claude Sonnet 5 is better at 8 benchmarks (BrowseComp, CharXiv-R, GDPval-AA, Humanity's Last Exam, Legal Agent Benchmark, SWE-bench Multilingual, SWE-Bench Verified, Terminal-Bench 2.0). Claude Sonnet 5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
On price, Claude Sonnet 5 is roughly 1.7x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Choose Claude Opus 4.6 if…
- you want predictable pricing at $5.00/M input and $25.00/M output
Choose Claude Sonnet 5 if…
- you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 8 of 8 shared benchmarks
- cost matters — it's about 1.7x cheaper per token
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jun 2026
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Claude Opus 4.6 outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Claude Sonnet 5 is better at 8 benchmarks (BrowseComp, CharXiv-R, GDPval-AA, Humanity's Last Exam, Legal Agent Benchmark, SWE-bench Multilingual, SWE-Bench Verified, Terminal-Bench 2.0).
Claude Sonnet 5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Claude Opus 4.6 ($5.00/1M tokens) is 1.7x more expensive than Claude Sonnet 5 ($3.00/1M tokens).
For output processing, Claude Opus 4.6 ($25.00/1M tokens) is 1.7x more expensive than Claude Sonnet 5 ($15.00/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Claude Opus 4.6 is more expensive than Claude Sonnet 5.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Both models have the same input context window of 1,000,000 tokens. Claude Opus 4.6 can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while Claude Sonnet 5 is limited to 64,000 tokens.
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Both Claude Opus 4.6 and Claude Sonnet 5 support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Sonnet 5
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.
Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.
Proprietary
Closed source
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Claude Opus 4.6 was released on 2026-02-05, while Claude Sonnet 5 was released on 2026-06-30.
Claude Sonnet 5 is 5 months newer than Claude Opus 4.6.
Feb 5, 2026
4 months ago
Jun 30, 2026
0 days ago
4mo newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
Claude Opus 4.6 is available from Anthropic. Claude Sonnet 5 is available from Anthropic.
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Sonnet 5
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Claude Opus 4.6
View detailsAnthropic
No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.
Claude Sonnet 5
View detailsAnthropic
Detailed Comparison
Interactive Arena
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Claude Opus 4.6 and Claude Sonnet 5 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
| Feature |
|---|
FAQ
Common questions about Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Sonnet 5.