Make AI phone calls with one API call

Start for free

Model Comparison

Claude Opus 4.6 vs DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max

Claude Opus 4.6 shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max is 4.6x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

8 benchmarks

Claude Opus 4.6 outperforms in 6 benchmarks (BrowseComp, GDPval-AA, GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, SWE-bench Multilingual, SWE-Bench Verified), while DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max is better at 2 benchmarks (MCP Atlas, Terminal-Bench 2.0).

Claude Opus 4.6 shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Fri Apr 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

CallingBox

Done comparing? Ship the phone agent.

One API for outbound and inbound calls.

Start for freeRead the docs
$0.05 /min all-in7 lines of code

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max costs less

For input processing, Claude Opus 4.6 ($5.00/1M tokens) is 2.9x more expensive than DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max ($1.74/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude Opus 4.6 ($25.00/1M tokens) is 7.2x more expensive than DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max ($3.48/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude Opus 4.6 is more expensive than DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri Apr 24 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6
Input tokens$5.00
Output tokens$25.00
Best providerAnthropic
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max
Input tokens$1.74
Output tokens$3.48
Best providerDeepSeek
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Claude Opus 4.6's 1,000,000 tokens. DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max can generate longer responses up to 393,216 tokens, while Claude Opus 4.6 is limited to 128,000 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output393,216 tokens
Fri Apr 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Claude Opus 4.6 supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max does not.

Claude Opus 4.6 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude Opus 4.6

Text
Images
Audio
Video

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude Opus 4.6 is licensed under a proprietary license, while DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude Opus 4.6

Proprietary

Closed source

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Opus 4.6 was released on 2026-02-05, while DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max was released on 2026-04-23.

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max is 3 months newer than Claude Opus 4.6.

Claude Opus 4.6

Feb 5, 2026

2 months ago

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max

Apr 23, 2026

1 days ago

2mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Claude Opus 4.6 is available from Anthropic. DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max is available from DeepSeek.

Claude Opus 4.6

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $5.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $25.00/1M

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max

deepseek logo
DeepSeek
Input Price:Input: $1.74/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.48/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Anthropic
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher BrowseComp score (84.0% vs 83.4%)
Higher GDPval-AA score (53.5% vs 51.8%)
Higher GPQA score (91.3% vs 90.1%)
Higher Humanity's Last Exam score (53.1% vs 48.2%)
Higher SWE-bench Multilingual score (77.8% vs 76.2%)
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (80.8% vs 80.6%)
DeepSeek
Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights
Higher MCP Atlas score (73.6% vs 62.7%)
Higher Terminal-Bench 2.0 score (67.9% vs 65.4%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Opus 4.6 vs DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max

Claude Opus 4.6 shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. Claude Opus 4.6 is made by Anthropic and DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max is made by DeepSeek. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Claude Opus 4.6 scores Vending-Bench 2: 100.0%, AIME 2025: 99.8%, Tau2 Telecom: 99.3%, Graphwalks parents >128k: 95.4%, MRCR v2 (8-needle): 93.0%. DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max scores CodeForces: 100.0%, HMMT Feb 26: 95.2%, LiveCodeBench: 93.5%, MathArena Apex: 90.2%, GPQA: 90.1%.
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max is 2.9x cheaper for input tokens. Claude Opus 4.6 costs $5.00/M input and $25.00/M output via anthropic. DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max costs $1.74/M input and $3.48/M output via deepseek.
Claude Opus 4.6 supports 1.0M tokens and DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 1.0M), input pricing ($5.00 vs $1.74/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Claude Opus 4.6 is developed by Anthropic and DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max is developed by DeepSeek.