Model Comparison

Claude Opus 4.6 vs Gemma 3 12B

Claude Opus 4.6 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemma 3 12B is 160.0x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

Claude Opus 4.6 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Gemma 3 12B is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude Opus 4.6 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Jun 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Gemma 3 12B costs less

For input processing, Claude Opus 4.6 ($5.00/1M tokens) is 100.0x more expensive than Gemma 3 12B ($0.05/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude Opus 4.6 ($25.00/1M tokens) is 250.0x more expensive than Gemma 3 12B ($0.10/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude Opus 4.6 is more expensive than Gemma 3 12B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers

Tue Jun 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

Claude Opus 4.6

Input tokens$5.00

Output tokens$25.00

Best providerAnthropic

Gemma 3 12B

Input tokens$0.05

Output tokens$0.10

Best providerDeepinfra

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Claude Opus 4.6 accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to Gemma 3 12B's 131,072 tokens. Gemma 3 12B can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while Claude Opus 4.6 is limited to 128,000 tokens.

Claude Opus 4.6

Input1,000,000 tokens

Output128,000 tokens

Gemma 3 12B

Input131,072 tokens

Output131,072 tokens

Tue Jun 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Claude Opus 4.6 and Gemma 3 12B support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude Opus 4.6

Text

Images

Audio

Video

Gemma 3 12B

Text

Images

Audio

Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude Opus 4.6 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Gemma 3 12B uses Gemma.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude Opus 4.6

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemma 3 12B

Gemma

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Opus 4.6 was released on 2026-02-05, while Gemma 3 12B was released on 2025-03-12.

Claude Opus 4.6 is 11 months newer than Gemma 3 12B.

Claude Opus 4.6

Feb 5, 2026

3 months ago

11mo newer

Gemma 3 12B

Mar 12, 2025

1.2 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Claude Opus 4.6 is available from Anthropic. Gemma 3 12B is available from DeepInfra.

Claude Opus 4.6

Anthropic

Input Price:Input: $5.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $25.00/1M

Gemma 3 12B

Deepinfra

Input Price:Input: $0.05/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.10/1M

* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Claude Opus 4.6

View details

Anthropic

Larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)

Higher GPQA score (91.3% vs 40.9%)

Gemma 3 12B

View details

Google

Less expensive input tokens

Less expensive output tokens

Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature	Claude Opus 4.6	Gemma 3 12B

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Opus 4.6 vs Gemma 3 12B.

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.6 or Gemma 3 12B?

Claude Opus 4.6 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Claude Opus 4.6 is made by Anthropic and Gemma 3 12B is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Claude Opus 4.6 compare to Gemma 3 12B in benchmarks?

Claude Opus 4.6 scores Vending-Bench 2: 100.0%, AIME 2025: 99.8%, Tau2 Telecom: 99.3%, Graphwalks parents >128k: 95.4%, MRCR v2 (8-needle): 93.0%. Gemma 3 12B scores GSM8k: 94.4%, IFEval: 88.9%, DocVQA: 87.1%, BIG-Bench Hard: 85.7%, HumanEval: 85.4%.

Is Claude Opus 4.6 cheaper than Gemma 3 12B?

Gemma 3 12B is 100.0x cheaper for input tokens. Claude Opus 4.6 costs $5.00/M input and $25.00/M output via anthropic. Gemma 3 12B costs $0.05/M input and $0.10/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Opus 4.6 and Gemma 3 12B?

Claude Opus 4.6 supports 1.0M tokens and Gemma 3 12B supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Opus 4.6 and Gemma 3 12B?

Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 131K), input pricing ($5.00 vs $0.05/M), licensing (Proprietary vs Gemma). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Opus 4.6 and Gemma 3 12B?

Claude Opus 4.6 is developed by Anthropic and Gemma 3 12B is developed by Google.