Model Comparison
Claude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-4 TurboWhich is better in 2026?
Claude Opus 4.6 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Claude Opus 4.6 is 1.5x cheaper per token.
Verdict: Claude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-4 Turbo — which is better?
Claude Opus 4.6 (by Anthropic) and GPT-4 Turbo (by OpenAI) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.
Claude Opus 4.6 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while GPT-4 Turbo is better at 0 benchmarks. Claude Opus 4.6 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
On price, Claude Opus 4.6 is roughly 1.5x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Claude Opus 4.6 also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Choose Claude Opus 4.6 if…
- you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks
- cost matters — it's about 1.5x cheaper per token
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Feb 2026
Choose GPT-4 Turbo if…
- you want predictable pricing at $10.00/M input and $30.00/M output
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Claude Opus 4.6 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while GPT-4 Turbo is better at 0 benchmarks.
Claude Opus 4.6 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Claude Opus 4.6 ($5.00/1M tokens) is 2.0x cheaper than GPT-4 Turbo ($10.00/1M tokens).
For output processing, Claude Opus 4.6 ($25.00/1M tokens) is 1.2x cheaper than GPT-4 Turbo ($30.00/1M tokens).
In conclusion, GPT-4 Turbo is more expensive than Claude Opus 4.6.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Claude Opus 4.6 accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to GPT-4 Turbo's 128,000 tokens. Claude Opus 4.6 can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while GPT-4 Turbo is limited to 4,096 tokens.
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Claude Opus 4.6 supports multimodal inputs, whereas GPT-4 Turbo does not.
Claude Opus 4.6 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Claude Opus 4.6
GPT-4 Turbo
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.
Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.
Proprietary
Closed source
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Claude Opus 4.6 was released on 2026-02-05, while GPT-4 Turbo was released on 2024-04-09.
Claude Opus 4.6 is 22 months newer than GPT-4 Turbo.
Feb 5, 2026
4 months ago
1.8yr newerApr 9, 2024
2.2 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
GPT-4 Turbo has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-12-31, while Claude Opus 4.6's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm GPT-4 Turbo's training data extends to 2023-12-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Claude Opus 4.6's cutoff date.
—
Dec 2023
Provider Availability
Claude Opus 4.6 is available from Anthropic. GPT-4 Turbo is available from Azure, OpenAI.
Claude Opus 4.6
GPT-4 Turbo
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Claude Opus 4.6
View detailsAnthropic
GPT-4 Turbo
View detailsOpenAI
No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
|---|
FAQ
Common questions about Claude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-4 Turbo.