Model Comparison

GPT-4 Turbo vs Kimi K3Which is better in 2026?

Kimi K3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Kimi K3 is 2.5x cheaper per token.

Verdict: GPT-4 Turbo vs Kimi K3 — which is better?

GPT-4 Turbo (by OpenAI) and Kimi K3 (by Moonshot AI) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

GPT-4 Turbo outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Kimi K3 is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA). Kimi K3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

On price, Kimi K3 is roughly 2.5x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Kimi K3 also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose GPT-4 Turbo if…

  • you want predictable pricing at $10.00/M input and $30.00/M output

Choose Kimi K3 if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks
  • cost matters — it's about 2.5x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2026

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

GPT-4 Turbo outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Kimi K3 is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).

Kimi K3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Jul 18 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Kimi K3 costs less

For input processing, GPT-4 Turbo ($10.00/1M tokens) is 3.3x more expensive than Kimi K3 ($3.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, GPT-4 Turbo ($30.00/1M tokens) is 2.0x more expensive than Kimi K3 ($15.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GPT-4 Turbo is more expensive than Kimi K3.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat Jul 18 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
GPT-4 Turbo
Input tokens$10.00
Output tokens$30.00
Best providerAzure
Moonshot AI
Kimi K3
Input tokens$3.00
Output tokens$15.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Kimi K3 accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to GPT-4 Turbo's 128,000 tokens. Kimi K3 can generate longer responses up to 1,048,576 tokens, while GPT-4 Turbo is limited to 4,096 tokens.

OpenAI
GPT-4 Turbo
Input128,000 tokens
Output4,096 tokens
Moonshot AI
Kimi K3
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output1,048,576 tokens
Sat Jul 18 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Kimi K3 supports multimodal inputs, whereas GPT-4 Turbo does not.

Kimi K3 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

GPT-4 Turbo

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Kimi K3

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-4 Turbo was released on 2024-04-09, while Kimi K3 was released on 2026-07-16.

Kimi K3 is 28 months newer than GPT-4 Turbo.

GPT-4 Turbo

Apr 9, 2024

2.3 years ago

Kimi K3

Jul 16, 2026

2 days ago

2.3yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-4 Turbo has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-12-31, while Kimi K3's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm GPT-4 Turbo's training data extends to 2023-12-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Kimi K3's cutoff date.

GPT-4 Turbo

Dec 2023

Kimi K3

Provider Availability

GPT-4 Turbo is available from Azure, OpenAI. Kimi K3 is available from Moonshot AI.

GPT-4 Turbo

azure logo
Azure
Input Price:Input: $10.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $30.00/1M
openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $10.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $30.00/1M

Kimi K3

moonshot logo
Unknown Organization
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights
Higher GPQA score (93.5% vs 48.0%)

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GPT-4 Turbo and Kimi K3 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GPT-4 Turbo
✓ Preferred
Kimi K3
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
OpenAI
GPT-4 Turbo
Moonshot AI
Kimi K3

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-4 Turbo vs Kimi K3.

Which is better, GPT-4 Turbo or Kimi K3?

Kimi K3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. GPT-4 Turbo is made by OpenAI and Kimi K3 is made by Moonshot AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does GPT-4 Turbo compare to Kimi K3 in benchmarks?

GPT-4 Turbo scores MGSM: 88.5%, HumanEval: 87.1%, MMLU: 86.5%, DROP: 86.0%, MATH: 72.6%. Kimi K3 scores MathVision: 97.8%, DeepSearchQA: 95.0%, GPQA: 93.5%, CharXiv-R: 91.3%, BrowseComp: 91.2%.

Is GPT-4 Turbo cheaper than Kimi K3?

Kimi K3 is 3.3x cheaper for input tokens. GPT-4 Turbo costs $10.00/M input and $30.00/M output via azure. Kimi K3 costs $3.00/M input and $15.00/M output via moonshot.

What are the context window sizes for GPT-4 Turbo and Kimi K3?

GPT-4 Turbo supports 128K tokens and Kimi K3 supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GPT-4 Turbo and Kimi K3?

Key differences include context window (128K vs 1.0M), input pricing ($10.00 vs $3.00/M), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Proprietary vs Unknown). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GPT-4 Turbo and Kimi K3?

GPT-4 Turbo is developed by OpenAI and Kimi K3 is developed by Moonshot AI.