Model Comparison

Claude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.2

Claude Opus 4.6 has a slight edge in benchmark performance. GPT-5.2 is 2.1x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

12 benchmarks

Claude Opus 4.6 outperforms in 7 benchmarks (ARC-AGI v2, BrowseComp, Humanity's Last Exam, MMMLU, SWE-Bench Verified, Tau2 Retail, Tau2 Telecom), while GPT-5.2 is better at 5 benchmarks (AIME 2025, CharXiv-R, GPQA, MCP Atlas, MMMU-Pro).

Claude Opus 4.6 has a slight edge in benchmark performance.

Tue Apr 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

GPT-5.2 costs less

For input processing, Claude Opus 4.6 ($5.00/1M tokens) is 2.9x more expensive than GPT-5.2 ($1.75/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude Opus 4.6 ($25.00/1M tokens) is 1.8x more expensive than GPT-5.2 ($14.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude Opus 4.6 is more expensive than GPT-5.2.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Apr 07 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6
Input tokens$5.00
Output tokens$25.00
Best providerAnthropic
OpenAI
GPT-5.2
Input tokens$1.75
Output tokens$14.00
Best providerOpenAI
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Claude Opus 4.6 accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to GPT-5.2's 400,000 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 128,000 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
OpenAI
GPT-5.2
Input400,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Tue Apr 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Claude Opus 4.6 and GPT-5.2 support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude Opus 4.6

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GPT-5.2

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude Opus 4.6

Proprietary

Closed source

GPT-5.2

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Opus 4.6 was released on 2026-02-05, while GPT-5.2 was released on 2025-12-11.

Claude Opus 4.6 is 2 months newer than GPT-5.2.

Claude Opus 4.6

Feb 5, 2026

2 months ago

1mo newer
GPT-5.2

Dec 11, 2025

3 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-5.2 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-08-25, while Claude Opus 4.6's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm GPT-5.2's training data extends to 2025-08-25, but cannot make a direct comparison without Claude Opus 4.6's cutoff date.

Claude Opus 4.6

—

GPT-5.2

Aug 2025

Provider Availability

Claude Opus 4.6 is available from Anthropic. GPT-5.2 is available from OpenAI.

Claude Opus 4.6

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $5.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $25.00/1M

GPT-5.2

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $1.75/1MOutput Price:Output: $14.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Anthropic
Larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)
Higher ARC-AGI v2 score (68.8% vs 52.9%)
Higher BrowseComp score (84.0% vs 65.8%)
Higher Humanity's Last Exam score (53.1% vs 34.5%)
Higher MMMLU score (91.1% vs 89.6%)
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (80.8% vs 80.0%)
Higher Tau2 Retail score (91.9% vs 82.0%)
Higher Tau2 Telecom score (99.3% vs 98.7%)
OpenAI
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Higher AIME 2025 score (100.0% vs 99.8%)
Higher CharXiv-R score (82.1% vs 77.4%)
Higher GPQA score (92.4% vs 91.3%)
Higher MCP Atlas score (60.6% vs 59.5%)
Higher MMMU-Pro score (79.5% vs 77.3%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6
OpenAI
GPT-5.2

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.2

Claude Opus 4.6 has a slight edge in benchmark performance. Claude Opus 4.6 is made by Anthropic and GPT-5.2 is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Claude Opus 4.6 scores Vending-Bench 2: 100.0%, AIME 2025: 99.8%, Tau2 Telecom: 99.3%, Graphwalks parents >128k: 95.4%, MRCR v2 (8-needle): 93.0%. GPT-5.2 scores AIME 2025: 100.0%, HMMT 2025: 99.4%, Tau2 Telecom: 98.7%, Graphwalks BFS <128k: 94.0%, GPQA: 92.4%.
GPT-5.2 is 2.9x cheaper for input tokens. Claude Opus 4.6 costs $5.00/M input and $25.00/M output via anthropic. GPT-5.2 costs $1.75/M input and $14.00/M output via openai.
Claude Opus 4.6 supports 1.0M tokens and GPT-5.2 supports 400K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 400K), input pricing ($5.00 vs $1.75/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Claude Opus 4.6 is developed by Anthropic and GPT-5.2 is developed by OpenAI.