The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude Opus 4.6 vs Hy3

Claude Opus 4.6 and Hy3 are closely matched at 45.3 and 43.1 on the LLM Stats Score.

Anthropic · Tencent · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude Opus 4.6 and Hy3 are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 45.3 and 43.1.

In the 6 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Claude Opus 4.6 wins 4; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude Opus 4.6

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 4 of 6 exact shared results

Choose Hy3

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
Hy3
Tencent
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
45.3
#29
43.1
#38
Reasoning
45.7
#23
43.1
#37
Coding
33.3
#30
33.4
#29
Agents
28.1
#34
26.7
#39
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
4 of 6
2 of 6
Input price
$5.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$25.00 / M
— / M
Context window
1,000,000
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
Claude Opus 4.6
Hy3
Math
40.1#15
36.3#38
Tool use
25.4#28
22.9#42
Research
25.2#10
24.9#11
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

27 reported for Claude Opus 4.6 · 31 for Hy3

6 shared

Claude Opus 4.6 outperforms in 4 benchmarks (DeepSearchQA, GPQA, SWE-bench Multilingual, SWE-Bench Verified), while Hy3 is better at 2 benchmarks (BrowseComp, MCP Atlas).

Claude Opus 4.6 shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Mon Aug 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude Opus 4.6 specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only Claude Opus 4.6 specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Tencent
Hy3
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Aug 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Claude Opus 4.6 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Hy3 does not.

Claude Opus 4.6 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude Opus 4.6

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Hy3

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude Opus 4.6 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Hy3 uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude Opus 4.6

Proprietary

Closed source

Hy3

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Opus 4.6 was released on 2026-02-05, while Hy3 was released on 2026-07-06.

Hy3 is 5 months newer than Claude Opus 4.6.

Claude Opus 4.6

Feb 5, 2026

6 months ago

Hy3

Jul 6, 2026

1 months ago

5mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude Opus 4.6 and Hy3 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude Opus 4.6
✓ Preferred
Hy3
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Opus 4.6 vs Hy3.

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.6 or Hy3?

Claude Opus 4.6 and Hy3 are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 45.3 and 43.1. Claude Opus 4.6 is made by Anthropic and Hy3 is made by Tencent. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude Opus 4.6 compare to Hy3 in benchmarks?

Claude Opus 4.6 scores Vending-Bench 2: 100.0%, AIME 2025: 99.8%, Tau2 Telecom: 99.3%, Graphwalks parents >128k: 95.4%, Tau2 Retail: 91.9%. Hy3 scores DeepSearchQA: 91.0%, GPQA: 90.4%, IMO-AnswerBench: 90.0%, BrowseComp: 84.2%, MCP Atlas: 79.1%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Opus 4.6 and Hy3?

Claude Opus 4.6 supports 1.0M tokens and Hy3 supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Opus 4.6 and Hy3?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (45.3 vs 43.1), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Opus 4.6 and Hy3?

Claude Opus 4.6 is developed by Anthropic and Hy3 is developed by Tencent.

Related comparisons