Model Comparison

Claude Opus 4.6 vs Kimi K2-Thinking-0905Which is better in 2026?

Claude Opus 4.6 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Kimi K2-Thinking-0905 is 11.7x cheaper per token.

Verdict: Claude Opus 4.6 vs Kimi K2-Thinking-0905 — which is better?

Claude Opus 4.6 (by Anthropic) and Kimi K2-Thinking-0905 (by Moonshot AI) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Claude Opus 4.6 outperforms in 5 benchmarks (BrowseComp, GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, SWE-bench Multilingual, SWE-Bench Verified), while Kimi K2-Thinking-0905 is better at 1 benchmark (AIME 2025). Claude Opus 4.6 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

On price, Kimi K2-Thinking-0905 is roughly 11.7x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Claude Opus 4.6 also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose Claude Opus 4.6 if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 5 of 6 shared benchmarks
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Feb 2026

Choose Kimi K2-Thinking-0905 if…

  • cost matters — it's about 11.7x cheaper per token
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

6 benchmarks

Claude Opus 4.6 outperforms in 5 benchmarks (BrowseComp, GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, SWE-bench Multilingual, SWE-Bench Verified), while Kimi K2-Thinking-0905 is better at 1 benchmark (AIME 2025).

Claude Opus 4.6 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Jun 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Kimi K2-Thinking-0905 costs less

For input processing, Claude Opus 4.6 ($5.00/1M tokens) is 10.6x more expensive than Kimi K2-Thinking-0905 ($0.47/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude Opus 4.6 ($25.00/1M tokens) is 12.5x more expensive than Kimi K2-Thinking-0905 ($2.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude Opus 4.6 is more expensive than Kimi K2-Thinking-0905.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sun Jun 07 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6
Input tokens$5.00
Output tokens$25.00
Best providerAnthropic
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2-Thinking-0905
Input tokens$0.47
Output tokens$2.00
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Claude Opus 4.6 accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to Kimi K2-Thinking-0905's 262,144 tokens. Kimi K2-Thinking-0905 can generate longer responses up to 262,144 tokens, while Claude Opus 4.6 is limited to 128,000 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2-Thinking-0905
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Sun Jun 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Claude Opus 4.6 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Kimi K2-Thinking-0905 does not.

Claude Opus 4.6 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude Opus 4.6

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Kimi K2-Thinking-0905

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude Opus 4.6 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Kimi K2-Thinking-0905 uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude Opus 4.6

Proprietary

Closed source

Kimi K2-Thinking-0905

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Opus 4.6 was released on 2026-02-05, while Kimi K2-Thinking-0905 was released on 2025-09-05.

Claude Opus 4.6 is 5 months newer than Kimi K2-Thinking-0905.

Claude Opus 4.6

Feb 5, 2026

4 months ago

5mo newer
Kimi K2-Thinking-0905

Sep 5, 2025

9 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Claude Opus 4.6 is available from Anthropic. Kimi K2-Thinking-0905 is available from DeepInfra, Novita, Fireworks.

Claude Opus 4.6

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $5.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $25.00/1M

Kimi K2-Thinking-0905

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.47/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.00/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.48/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.00/1M
fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.60/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.50/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Anthropic
Larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher BrowseComp score (84.0% vs 60.2%)
Higher GPQA score (91.3% vs 84.5%)
Higher Humanity's Last Exam score (53.1% vs 51.0%)
Higher SWE-bench Multilingual score (77.8% vs 61.1%)
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (80.8% vs 71.3%)
Moonshot AI
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights
Higher AIME 2025 score (100.0% vs 99.8%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2-Thinking-0905

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Opus 4.6 vs Kimi K2-Thinking-0905.

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.6 or Kimi K2-Thinking-0905?

Claude Opus 4.6 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Claude Opus 4.6 is made by Anthropic and Kimi K2-Thinking-0905 is made by Moonshot AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Claude Opus 4.6 compare to Kimi K2-Thinking-0905 in benchmarks?

Claude Opus 4.6 scores Vending-Bench 2: 100.0%, AIME 2025: 99.8%, Tau2 Telecom: 99.3%, Graphwalks parents >128k: 95.4%, MRCR v2 (8-needle): 93.0%. Kimi K2-Thinking-0905 scores AIME 2025: 100.0%, HMMT 2025: 97.5%, MMLU-Redux: 94.4%, FRAMES: 87.0%, MMLU-Pro: 84.6%.

Is Claude Opus 4.6 cheaper than Kimi K2-Thinking-0905?

Kimi K2-Thinking-0905 is 10.6x cheaper for input tokens. Claude Opus 4.6 costs $5.00/M input and $25.00/M output via anthropic. Kimi K2-Thinking-0905 costs $0.47/M input and $2.00/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Opus 4.6 and Kimi K2-Thinking-0905?

Claude Opus 4.6 supports 1.0M tokens and Kimi K2-Thinking-0905 supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Opus 4.6 and Kimi K2-Thinking-0905?

Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 262K), input pricing ($5.00 vs $0.47/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Opus 4.6 and Kimi K2-Thinking-0905?

Claude Opus 4.6 is developed by Anthropic and Kimi K2-Thinking-0905 is developed by Moonshot AI.

Related comparisons