Model Comparison

Claude Opus 4.6 vs MiMo-V2-Omni

Claude Opus 4.6 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. MiMo-V2-Omni is 12.5x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

Claude Opus 4.6 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GDPval-AA, SWE-Bench Verified), while MiMo-V2-Omni is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude Opus 4.6 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Apr 03 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

MiMo-V2-Omni costs less

For input processing, Claude Opus 4.6 ($5.00/1M tokens) is 12.5x more expensive than MiMo-V2-Omni ($0.40/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude Opus 4.6 ($25.00/1M tokens) is 12.5x more expensive than MiMo-V2-Omni ($2.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude Opus 4.6 is more expensive than MiMo-V2-Omni.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri Apr 03 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6
Input tokens$5.00
Output tokens$25.00
Best providerAnthropic
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Omni
Input tokens$0.40
Output tokens$2.00
Best providerXiaomi
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Claude Opus 4.6 accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to MiMo-V2-Omni's 262,000 tokens. Claude Opus 4.6 can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while MiMo-V2-Omni is limited to 16,384 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Omni
Input262,000 tokens
Output16,384 tokens
Fri Apr 03 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Claude Opus 4.6 and MiMo-V2-Omni support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude Opus 4.6

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiMo-V2-Omni

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude Opus 4.6

Proprietary

Closed source

MiMo-V2-Omni

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Opus 4.6 was released on 2026-02-05, while MiMo-V2-Omni was released on 2026-03-18.

MiMo-V2-Omni is 1 month newer than Claude Opus 4.6.

Claude Opus 4.6

Feb 5, 2026

1 months ago

MiMo-V2-Omni

Mar 18, 2026

2 weeks ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Claude Opus 4.6 is available from Anthropic. MiMo-V2-Omni is available from Xiaomi.

Claude Opus 4.6

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $5.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $25.00/1M

MiMo-V2-Omni

xiaomi logo
Xiaomi
Input Price:Input: $0.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Anthropic
Larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)
Higher GDPval-AA score (53.5% vs 47.0%)
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (80.8% vs 74.8%)
Xiaomi
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Omni

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Opus 4.6 vs MiMo-V2-Omni

Claude Opus 4.6 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Claude Opus 4.6 is made by Anthropic and MiMo-V2-Omni is made by Xiaomi. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Claude Opus 4.6 scores Vending-Bench 2: 100.0%, AIME 2025: 99.8%, Tau2 Telecom: 99.3%, Graphwalks parents >128k: 95.4%, MRCR v2 (8-needle): 93.0%. MiMo-V2-Omni scores PinchBench: 81.2%, SWE-Bench Verified: 74.8%, Claw-Eval: 54.8%, MM-BrowserComp: 52.0%, OmniGAIA: 49.8%.
MiMo-V2-Omni is 12.5x cheaper for input tokens. Claude Opus 4.6 costs $5.00/M input and $25.00/M output via anthropic. MiMo-V2-Omni costs $0.40/M input and $2.00/M output via xiaomi.
Claude Opus 4.6 supports 1.0M tokens and MiMo-V2-Omni supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 262K), input pricing ($5.00 vs $0.40/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Claude Opus 4.6 is developed by Anthropic and MiMo-V2-Omni is developed by Xiaomi.