Model Comparison

Claude Opus 4.6 vs Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)Which is better in 2026?

Claude Opus 4.6 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) is 50.0x cheaper per token.

Verdict: Claude Opus 4.6 vs Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) — which is better?

Claude Opus 4.6 (by Anthropic) and Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) (by NVIDIA) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Claude Opus 4.6 outperforms in 9 benchmarks (AIME 2025, BrowseComp, GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, SWE-bench Multilingual, SWE-Bench Verified, Tau2 Retail, Tau2 Telecom, Terminal-Bench 2.0), while Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) is better at 0 benchmarks. Claude Opus 4.6 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

On price, Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) is roughly 50.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Claude Opus 4.6 also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose Claude Opus 4.6 if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 9 of 9 shared benchmarks
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window

Choose Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) if…

  • cost matters — it's about 50.0x cheaper per token
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Mar 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

9 benchmarks

Claude Opus 4.6 outperforms in 9 benchmarks (AIME 2025, BrowseComp, GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, SWE-bench Multilingual, SWE-Bench Verified, Tau2 Retail, Tau2 Telecom, Terminal-Bench 2.0), while Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude Opus 4.6 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Jun 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) costs less

For input processing, Claude Opus 4.6 ($5.00/1M tokens) is 50.0x more expensive than Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude Opus 4.6 ($25.00/1M tokens) is 50.0x more expensive than Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) ($0.50/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude Opus 4.6 is more expensive than Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B).*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Jun 15 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6
Input tokens$5.00
Output tokens$25.00
Best providerAnthropic
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.50
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Claude Opus 4.6 accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)'s 262,144 tokens. Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) can generate longer responses up to 262,144 tokens, while Claude Opus 4.6 is limited to 128,000 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Mon Jun 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Claude Opus 4.6 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) does not.

Claude Opus 4.6 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude Opus 4.6

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude Opus 4.6 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) uses NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement .

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude Opus 4.6

Proprietary

Closed source

Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)

NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Opus 4.6 was released on 2026-02-05, while Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) was released on 2026-03-11.

Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) is 1 month newer than Claude Opus 4.6.

Claude Opus 4.6

Feb 5, 2026

4 months ago

Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)

Mar 11, 2026

3 months ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-06-01, while Claude Opus 4.6's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)'s training data extends to 2025-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Claude Opus 4.6's cutoff date.

Claude Opus 4.6

—

Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)

Jun 2025

Provider Availability

Claude Opus 4.6 is available from Anthropic. Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) is available from DeepInfra.

Claude Opus 4.6

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $5.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $25.00/1M

Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.50/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Anthropic
Larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher AIME 2025 score (99.8% vs 90.2%)
Higher BrowseComp score (84.0% vs 31.3%)
Higher GPQA score (91.3% vs 82.7%)
Higher Humanity's Last Exam score (53.1% vs 22.8%)
Higher SWE-bench Multilingual score (77.8% vs 45.8%)
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (80.8% vs 53.7%)
Higher Tau2 Retail score (91.9% vs 62.8%)
Higher Tau2 Telecom score (99.3% vs 64.4%)
Higher Terminal-Bench 2.0 score (65.4% vs 31.0%)
NVIDIA
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Opus 4.6 vs Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B).

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.6 or Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)?

Claude Opus 4.6 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Claude Opus 4.6 is made by Anthropic and Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) is made by NVIDIA. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Claude Opus 4.6 compare to Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) in benchmarks?

Claude Opus 4.6 scores Vending-Bench 2: 100.0%, AIME 2025: 99.8%, Tau2 Telecom: 99.3%, Graphwalks parents >128k: 95.4%, Tau2 Retail: 91.9%. Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) scores HMMT 2025: 94.7%, RULER: 91.8%, AIME 2025: 90.2%, WMT24++: 86.7%, MMLU-Pro: 83.7%.

Is Claude Opus 4.6 cheaper than Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)?

Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) is 50.0x cheaper for input tokens. Claude Opus 4.6 costs $5.00/M input and $25.00/M output via anthropic. Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) costs $0.10/M input and $0.50/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Opus 4.6 and Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)?

Claude Opus 4.6 supports 1.0M tokens and Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Opus 4.6 and Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)?

Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 262K), input pricing ($5.00 vs $0.10/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement ). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Opus 4.6 and Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)?

Claude Opus 4.6 is developed by Anthropic and Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) is developed by NVIDIA.

Related comparisons