Claude Opus 4.6 vs Qwen3.5-35B-A3B Comparison
Comparing Claude Opus 4.6 and Qwen3.5-35B-A3B across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Claude Opus 4.6 outperforms in 7 benchmarks (BrowseComp, GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, MMMLU, MMMU-Pro, SWE-Bench Verified, Terminal-Bench 2.0), while Qwen3.5-35B-A3B is better at 1 benchmark (CharXiv-R).
Claude Opus 4.6 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
Cost data unavailable.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Only Qwen3.5-35B-A3B specifies input context (262,144 tokens). Only Qwen3.5-35B-A3B specifies output context (65,000 tokens).
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Both Claude Opus 4.6 and Qwen3.5-35B-A3B support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Claude Opus 4.6
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
License
Usage and distribution terms
Claude Opus 4.6 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3.5-35B-A3B uses Apache 2.0.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Proprietary
Closed source
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Claude Opus 4.6 was released on 2026-02-05, while Qwen3.5-35B-A3B was released on 2026-02-24.
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B is 1 month newer than Claude Opus 4.6.
Feb 5, 2026
1 months ago
Feb 24, 2026
3 weeks ago
2w newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Claude Opus 4.6
View detailsAnthropic
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
View detailsAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Detailed Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|