The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude Opus 4.8 vs GLM-5.3

GLM-5.3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. GLM-5.3 is 4.7x cheaper per token.

Anthropic · Zhipu AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude Opus 4.8 outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while GLM-5.3 is better at 5 benchmarks (CyberGym, DeepSWE 1.1, FrontierSWE, Humanity's Last Exam, Toolathlon). GLM-5.3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

On price, GLM-5.3 is roughly 4.7x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude Opus 4.8

  • you want predictable pricing at $5.00/M input and $25.00/M output

Choose GLM-5.3

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 5 of 5 shared benchmarks
  • cost matters — it's about 4.7x cheaper per token
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
0 of 5
5 of 5
Input price
$5.00 / M
$1.40 / M
Output price
$25.00 / M
$4.40 / M
Context window
1,000,000
1,000,000
Released
May 2026
Aug 2026
License
Proprietary
Unknown

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

5 benchmarks

Claude Opus 4.8 outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while GLM-5.3 is better at 5 benchmarks (CyberGym, DeepSWE 1.1, FrontierSWE, Humanity's Last Exam, Toolathlon).

GLM-5.3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

GLM-5.3 costs less

For input processing, Claude Opus 4.8 ($5.00/1M tokens) is 3.6x more expensive than GLM-5.3 ($1.40/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude Opus 4.8 ($25.00/1M tokens) is 5.7x more expensive than GLM-5.3 ($4.40/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude Opus 4.8 is more expensive than GLM-5.3.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.8
Input tokens$5.00
Output tokens$25.00
Best providerAnthropic
Zhipu AI
GLM-5.3
Input tokens$1.40
Output tokens$4.40
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Both models have the same input context window of 1,000,000 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 128,000 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.8
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Zhipu AI
GLM-5.3
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Claude Opus 4.8 supports multimodal inputs, whereas GLM-5.3 does not.

Claude Opus 4.8 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude Opus 4.8

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GLM-5.3

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Opus 4.8 was released on 2026-05-28, while GLM-5.3 was released on 2026-08-14.

GLM-5.3 is 3 months newer than Claude Opus 4.8.

Claude Opus 4.8

May 28, 2026

2 months ago

GLM-5.3

Aug 14, 2026

1 weeks ago

2mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Claude Opus 4.8 is available from Anthropic, Vertex AI. GLM-5.3 is available from ZAI.

Claude Opus 4.8

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $5.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $25.00/1M
vertex logo
Unknown Organization
Input Price:Input: $5.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $25.00/1M

GLM-5.3

z logo
Unknown Organization
Input Price:Input: $1.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.40/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude Opus 4.8 and GLM-5.3 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude Opus 4.8
✓ Preferred
GLM-5.3
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Opus 4.8 vs GLM-5.3.

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.8 or GLM-5.3?

GLM-5.3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Claude Opus 4.8 is made by Anthropic and GLM-5.3 is made by Zhipu AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Claude Opus 4.8 compare to GLM-5.3 in benchmarks?

Claude Opus 4.8 scores GPQA: 93.6%, DeepSearchQA: 93.1%, CharXiv-R: 89.9%, SWE-Bench Verified: 88.6%, ScreenSpot Pro: 87.9%. GLM-5.3 scores Terminal-Bench 2.1: 88.2%, CyberGym: 84.5%, FrontierSWE: 78.1%, Toolathlon: 73.0%, DeepSWE 1.1: 66.9%.

Is Claude Opus 4.8 cheaper than GLM-5.3?

GLM-5.3 is 3.6x cheaper for input tokens. Claude Opus 4.8 costs $5.00/M input and $25.00/M output via anthropic. GLM-5.3 costs $1.40/M input and $4.40/M output via z.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Opus 4.8 and GLM-5.3?

Claude Opus 4.8 supports 1.0M tokens and GLM-5.3 supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Opus 4.8 and GLM-5.3?

Key differences include input pricing ($5.00 vs $1.40/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Unknown). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Opus 4.8 and GLM-5.3?

Claude Opus 4.8 is developed by Anthropic and GLM-5.3 is developed by Zhipu AI.