The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GLM-5.3 vs Grok 4.6

GLM-5.3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. GLM-5.3 is 1.4x cheaper per token.

Zhipu AI · xAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

GLM-5.3 outperforms in 3 benchmarks (DeepSWE 1.1, GDPval-AA, Terminal-Bench 3.0), while Grok 4.6 is better at 0 benchmarks. GLM-5.3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

On price, GLM-5.3 is roughly 1.4x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

GLM-5.3 also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GLM-5.3

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 3 of 3 shared benchmarks
  • cost matters — it's about 1.4x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

Choose Grok 4.6

  • you want predictable pricing at $2.00/M input and $6.00/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
3 of 3
0 of 3
Input price
$1.40 / M
$2.00 / M
Output price
$4.40 / M
$6.00 / M
Context window
1,000,000
500,000
Released
Aug 2026
Aug 2026
License
Unknown
Proprietary

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

GLM-5.3 outperforms in 3 benchmarks (DeepSWE 1.1, GDPval-AA, Terminal-Bench 3.0), while Grok 4.6 is better at 0 benchmarks.

GLM-5.3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Aug 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

GLM-5.3 costs less

For input processing, GLM-5.3 ($1.40/1M tokens) is 1.4x cheaper than Grok 4.6 ($2.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, GLM-5.3 ($4.40/1M tokens) is 1.4x cheaper than Grok 4.6 ($6.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Grok 4.6 is more expensive than GLM-5.3.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Aug 24 2026 • llm-stats.com
Zhipu AI
GLM-5.3
Input tokens$1.40
Output tokens$4.40
Best providerUnknown Organization
xAI
Grok 4.6
Input tokens$2.00
Output tokens$6.00
Best providerxAI
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

GLM-5.3 accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to Grok 4.6's 500,000 tokens. Only GLM-5.3 specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Zhipu AI
GLM-5.3
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
xAI
Grok 4.6
Input500,000 tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Aug 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Grok 4.6 supports multimodal inputs, whereas GLM-5.3 does not.

Grok 4.6 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

GLM-5.3

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Grok 4.6

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GLM-5.3 was released on 2026-08-14, while Grok 4.6 was released on 2026-08-12.

GLM-5.3 is 0 month newer than Grok 4.6.

GLM-5.3

Aug 14, 2026

1 weeks ago

2d newer
Grok 4.6

Aug 12, 2026

1 weeks ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Grok 4.6 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-02-01, while GLM-5.3's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Grok 4.6's training data extends to 2026-02-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without GLM-5.3's cutoff date.

GLM-5.3

Grok 4.6

Feb 2026

Provider Availability

GLM-5.3 is available from ZAI. Grok 4.6 is available from xAI.

GLM-5.3

z logo
Unknown Organization
Input Price:Input: $1.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.40/1M

Grok 4.6

xai logo
xAI
Input Price:Input: $2.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $6.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GLM-5.3 and Grok 4.6 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GLM-5.3
✓ Preferred
Grok 4.6
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GLM-5.3 vs Grok 4.6.

Which is better, GLM-5.3 or Grok 4.6?

GLM-5.3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. GLM-5.3 is made by Zhipu AI and Grok 4.6 is made by xAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does GLM-5.3 compare to Grok 4.6 in benchmarks?

GLM-5.3 scores Terminal-Bench 2.1: 88.2%, CyberGym: 84.5%, FrontierSWE: 78.1%, Toolathlon: 73.0%, DeepSWE 1.1: 66.9%. Grok 4.6 scores CursorBench v3.2: 69.9%, DeepSWE 1.1: 65.9%, FrontierCode: 61.3%, AA-Index: 61.0%, GDPval-AA: 58.4%.

Is GLM-5.3 cheaper than Grok 4.6?

GLM-5.3 is 1.4x cheaper for input tokens. GLM-5.3 costs $1.40/M input and $4.40/M output via z. Grok 4.6 costs $2.00/M input and $6.00/M output via xai.

What are the context window sizes for GLM-5.3 and Grok 4.6?

GLM-5.3 supports 1.0M tokens and Grok 4.6 supports 500K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GLM-5.3 and Grok 4.6?

Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 500K), input pricing ($1.40 vs $2.00/M), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Unknown vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GLM-5.3 and Grok 4.6?

GLM-5.3 is developed by Zhipu AI and Grok 4.6 is developed by xAI.