Model Comparison
Claude Opus 4.8 vs MiMo-V2-OmniWhich is better in 2026?
Claude Opus 4.8 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. MiMo-V2-Omni is 12.5x cheaper per token.
Verdict: Claude Opus 4.8 vs MiMo-V2-Omni — which is better?
Claude Opus 4.8 (by Anthropic) and MiMo-V2-Omni (by Xiaomi) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.
Claude Opus 4.8 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GDPval-AA, SWE-Bench Verified), while MiMo-V2-Omni is better at 0 benchmarks. Claude Opus 4.8 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
On price, MiMo-V2-Omni is roughly 12.5x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Claude Opus 4.8 also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Choose Claude Opus 4.8 if…
- you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped May 2026
Choose MiMo-V2-Omni if…
- cost matters — it's about 12.5x cheaper per token
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Claude Opus 4.8 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GDPval-AA, SWE-Bench Verified), while MiMo-V2-Omni is better at 0 benchmarks.
Claude Opus 4.8 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Claude Opus 4.8 ($5.00/1M tokens) is 12.5x more expensive than MiMo-V2-Omni ($0.40/1M tokens).
For output processing, Claude Opus 4.8 ($25.00/1M tokens) is 12.5x more expensive than MiMo-V2-Omni ($2.00/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Claude Opus 4.8 is more expensive than MiMo-V2-Omni.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Claude Opus 4.8 accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to MiMo-V2-Omni's 262,000 tokens. Claude Opus 4.8 can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while MiMo-V2-Omni is limited to 16,384 tokens.
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Both Claude Opus 4.8 and MiMo-V2-Omni support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Claude Opus 4.8
MiMo-V2-Omni
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.
Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.
Proprietary
Closed source
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Claude Opus 4.8 was released on 2026-05-28, while MiMo-V2-Omni was released on 2026-03-18.
Claude Opus 4.8 is 2 months newer than MiMo-V2-Omni.
May 28, 2026
1 months ago
2mo newerMar 18, 2026
4 months ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
Claude Opus 4.8 is available from Anthropic, Vertex AI. MiMo-V2-Omni is available from Xiaomi.
Claude Opus 4.8
MiMo-V2-Omni
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Claude Opus 4.8
View detailsAnthropic
MiMo-V2-Omni
View detailsXiaomi
Detailed Comparison
Interactive Arena
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Claude Opus 4.8 and MiMo-V2-Omni side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
| Feature | | |
|---|
FAQ
Common questions about Claude Opus 4.8 vs MiMo-V2-Omni.