The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 2.0 Flash

Claude Opus 5.5 leads the LLM Stats Score 59.8 to 16.5. Gemini 2.0 Flash is 45.7x cheaper per token.

Anthropic · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude Opus 5.5 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 59.8 to 16.5, ranking #1 overall.

On price, Gemini 2.0 Flash is roughly 45.7x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Gemini 2.0 Flash also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude Opus 5.5

  • overall performance matters — it scores 59.8 and ranks #1 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Gemini 2.0 Flash

  • cost matters — it's about 45.7x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Claude Opus 5.5
Anthropic
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Google
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
59.8
#1
16.5
#225
Reasoning
57.9
#1
15.8
#224
Coding
51.8
#1
1.7
#233
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$4.00 / M
$0.10 / M
Output price
$20.00 / M
$0.40 / M
Context window
1,000,000
1,048,576

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
Claude Opus 5.5
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Math
42.5#5
23.4#131
Vision
42.9#1
7.9#141
Multimodal
42.6#1
13.6#100
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

31 reported for Claude Opus 5.5 · 13 for Gemini 2.0 Flash

No common benchmarks found

Claude Opus 5.5 and Gemini 2.0 Flashdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Gemini 2.0 Flash costs less

For input processing, Claude Opus 5.5 ($4.00/1M tokens) is 40.0x more expensive than Gemini 2.0 Flash ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude Opus 5.5 ($20.00/1M tokens) is 50.0x more expensive than Gemini 2.0 Flash ($0.40/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude Opus 5.5 is more expensive than Gemini 2.0 Flash.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude Opus 5.5
Input tokens$4.00
Output tokens$20.00
Best providerAnthropic
Google
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.40
Best providerGoogle
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 2.0 Flash accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Claude Opus 5.5's 1,000,000 tokens. Claude Opus 5.5 can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while Gemini 2.0 Flash is limited to 8,192 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude Opus 5.5
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Google
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Claude Opus 5.5 and Gemini 2.0 Flash support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude Opus 5.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemini 2.0 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude Opus 5.5

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemini 2.0 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Opus 5.5 was released on 2026-09-22, while Gemini 2.0 Flash was released on 2024-12-01.

Claude Opus 5.5 is 22 months newer than Gemini 2.0 Flash.

Claude Opus 5.5

Sep 22, 2026

0 days ago

1.8yr newer
Gemini 2.0 Flash

Dec 1, 2024

1.8 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Claude Opus 5.5 has a knowledge cutoff of 2026-06-01, while Gemini 2.0 Flash has a cutoff of 2024-08-01.

Claude Opus 5.5 has more recent training data (up to 2026-06-01), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Gemini 2.0 Flash (2024-08-01).

Claude Opus 5.5

Jun 2026

1.8 yr newer
Gemini 2.0 Flash

Aug 2024

Provider Availability

Claude Opus 5.5 is available from Anthropic. Gemini 2.0 Flash is available from Google.

Claude Opus 5.5

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $4.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $20.00/1M

Gemini 2.0 Flash

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.40/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude Opus 5.5 and Gemini 2.0 Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude Opus 5.5
✓ Preferred
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 2.0 Flash.

Which is better, Claude Opus 5.5 or Gemini 2.0 Flash?

Claude Opus 5.5 leads the LLM Stats Score 59.8 to 16.5. Claude Opus 5.5 is made by Anthropic and Gemini 2.0 Flash is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude Opus 5.5 compare to Gemini 2.0 Flash in benchmarks?

Claude Opus 5.5 scores BenchCAD (with Python tool): 96.2%, Global-MMLU: 94.3%, SWE-bench Multilingual: 93.9%, MILU: 93.1%, ArXivMath: 91.2%. Gemini 2.0 Flash scores Natural2Code: 92.9%, MATH: 89.7%, FACTS Grounding: 83.6%, MMLU-Pro: 76.4%, EgoSchema: 71.5%.

Is Claude Opus 5.5 cheaper than Gemini 2.0 Flash?

Gemini 2.0 Flash is 40.0x cheaper for input tokens. Claude Opus 5.5 costs $4.00/M input and $20.00/M output via anthropic. Gemini 2.0 Flash costs $0.10/M input and $0.40/M output via google.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Opus 5.5 and Gemini 2.0 Flash?

Claude Opus 5.5 supports 1.0M tokens and Gemini 2.0 Flash supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Opus 5.5 and Gemini 2.0 Flash?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (59.8 vs 16.5), context window (1.0M vs 1.0M), input pricing ($4.00 vs $0.10/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Opus 5.5 and Gemini 2.0 Flash?

Claude Opus 5.5 is developed by Anthropic and Gemini 2.0 Flash is developed by Google.

Related comparisons