The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Grok-2 Image 1212

Comparing Claude Opus 5.5 and Grok-2 Image 1212 across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Anthropic · xAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude Opus 5.5 and Grok-2 Image 1212 trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

Claude Opus 5.5 also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude Opus 5.5

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Grok-2 Image 1212

  • you are already invested in the xAI ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Claude Opus 5.5
Anthropic
Grok-2 Image 1212
xAI
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$4.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$20.00 / M
— / M
Context window
1,000,000
131,072

Individual benchmarks

31 reported for Claude Opus 5.5 · 0 for Grok-2 Image 1212

No common benchmarks found

Claude Opus 5.5 and Grok-2 Image 1212don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Claude Opus 5.5 accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to Grok-2 Image 1212's 131,072 tokens. Only Claude Opus 5.5 specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude Opus 5.5
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
xAI
Grok-2 Image 1212
Input131,072 tokens
Output- tokens
Wed Sep 23 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Claude Opus 5.5 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Grok-2 Image 1212 does not.

Claude Opus 5.5 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude Opus 5.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Grok-2 Image 1212

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude Opus 5.5

Proprietary

Closed source

Grok-2 Image 1212

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Opus 5.5 was released on 2026-09-22, while Grok-2 Image 1212 was released on 2024-12-12.

Claude Opus 5.5 is 22 months newer than Grok-2 Image 1212.

Claude Opus 5.5

Sep 22, 2026

0 days ago

1.8yr newer
Grok-2 Image 1212

Dec 12, 2024

1.8 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Claude Opus 5.5 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-06-01, while Grok-2 Image 1212's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Claude Opus 5.5's training data extends to 2026-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Grok-2 Image 1212's cutoff date.

Claude Opus 5.5

Jun 2026

Grok-2 Image 1212

—

Provider Availability

Claude Opus 5.5 is available from Anthropic. Grok-2 Image 1212 is available from xAI.

Claude Opus 5.5

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $4.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $20.00/1M

Grok-2 Image 1212

xai logo
xAI
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude Opus 5.5 and Grok-2 Image 1212 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude Opus 5.5
✓ Preferred
Grok-2 Image 1212
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Opus 5.5 vs Grok-2 Image 1212.

Which is better, Claude Opus 5.5 or Grok-2 Image 1212?

Claude Opus 5.5 (Anthropic) and Grok-2 Image 1212 (xAI) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Claude Opus 5.5 compare to Grok-2 Image 1212 in benchmarks?

Claude Opus 5.5 scores BenchCAD (with Python tool): 96.2%, Global-MMLU: 94.3%, SWE-bench Multilingual: 93.9%, MILU: 93.1%, ArXivMath: 91.2%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Opus 5.5 and Grok-2 Image 1212?

Claude Opus 5.5 supports 1.0M tokens and Grok-2 Image 1212 supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Opus 5.5 and Grok-2 Image 1212?

Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 131K), multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Opus 5.5 and Grok-2 Image 1212?

Claude Opus 5.5 is developed by Anthropic and Grok-2 Image 1212 is developed by xAI.

Related comparisons