The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude Opus 5.5 vs o1

Claude Opus 5.5 leads the LLM Stats Score 59.8 to 20.9. Claude Opus 5.5 is 3.3x cheaper per token.

Anthropic · OpenAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude Opus 5.5 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 59.8 to 20.9, ranking #1 overall.

On price, Claude Opus 5.5 is roughly 3.3x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Claude Opus 5.5 also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude Opus 5.5

  • overall performance matters — it scores 59.8 and ranks #1 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • cost matters — it's about 3.3x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose o1

  • you want predictable pricing at $15.00/M input and $60.00/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Claude Opus 5.5
Anthropic
o1
OpenAI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
59.8
#1
20.9
#195
Reasoning
57.9
#1
21.3
#185
Coding
51.8
#1
4.6
#210
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$4.00 / M
$15.00 / M
Output price
$20.00 / M
$60.00 / M
Context window
1,000,000
200,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

4 shared
Index
Claude Opus 5.5
o1
Math
42.5#5
24.0#122
Vision
42.9#1
12.6#101
Tool use
32.9#2
12.7#104
Multimodal
42.6#1
16.3#84
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

31 reported for Claude Opus 5.5 · 19 for o1

No common benchmarks found

Claude Opus 5.5 and o1don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Claude Opus 5.5 costs less

For input processing, Claude Opus 5.5 ($4.00/1M tokens) is 3.8x cheaper than o1 ($15.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude Opus 5.5 ($20.00/1M tokens) is 3.0x cheaper than o1 ($60.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, o1 is more expensive than Claude Opus 5.5.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude Opus 5.5
Input tokens$4.00
Output tokens$20.00
Best providerAnthropic
OpenAI
o1
Input tokens$15.00
Output tokens$60.00
Best providerAzure
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Claude Opus 5.5 accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to o1's 200,000 tokens. Claude Opus 5.5 can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while o1 is limited to 100,000 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude Opus 5.5
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
OpenAI
o1
Input200,000 tokens
Output100,000 tokens
Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Claude Opus 5.5 supports multimodal inputs, whereas o1 does not.

Claude Opus 5.5 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude Opus 5.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

o1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude Opus 5.5

Proprietary

Closed source

o1

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Opus 5.5 was released on 2026-09-22, while o1 was released on 2024-12-17.

Claude Opus 5.5 is 21 months newer than o1.

Claude Opus 5.5

Sep 22, 2026

0 days ago

1.8yr newer
o1

Dec 17, 2024

1.8 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Claude Opus 5.5 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-06-01, while o1's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Claude Opus 5.5's training data extends to 2026-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without o1's cutoff date.

Claude Opus 5.5

Jun 2026

o1

—

Provider Availability

Claude Opus 5.5 is available from Anthropic. o1 is available from Azure, OpenAI.

Claude Opus 5.5

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $4.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $20.00/1M

o1

azure logo
Azure
Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $60.00/1M
openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $60.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude Opus 5.5 and o1 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude Opus 5.5
✓ Preferred
o1
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Opus 5.5 vs o1.

Which is better, Claude Opus 5.5 or o1?

Claude Opus 5.5 leads the LLM Stats Score 59.8 to 20.9. Claude Opus 5.5 is made by Anthropic and o1 is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude Opus 5.5 compare to o1 in benchmarks?

Claude Opus 5.5 scores BenchCAD (with Python tool): 96.2%, Global-MMLU: 94.3%, SWE-bench Multilingual: 93.9%, MILU: 93.1%, ArXivMath: 91.2%. o1 scores GSM8k: 97.1%, MATH: 96.4%, GPQA Physics: 92.8%, MMLU: 91.8%, MGSM: 89.3%.

Is Claude Opus 5.5 cheaper than o1?

Claude Opus 5.5 is 3.8x cheaper for input tokens. Claude Opus 5.5 costs $4.00/M input and $20.00/M output via anthropic. o1 costs $15.00/M input and $60.00/M output via azure.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Opus 5.5 and o1?

Claude Opus 5.5 supports 1.0M tokens and o1 supports 200K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Opus 5.5 and o1?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (59.8 vs 20.9), context window (1.0M vs 200K), input pricing ($4.00 vs $15.00/M), multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Opus 5.5 and o1?

Claude Opus 5.5 is developed by Anthropic and o1 is developed by OpenAI.

Related comparisons