The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

Claude Opus 5.5 leads the LLM Stats Score 59.7 to 21.1. Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct is 16.8x cheaper per token.

Anthropic · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude Opus 5.5 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 59.7 to 21.1, ranking #1 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Claude Opus 5.5 wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct is roughly 16.8x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Claude Opus 5.5 also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude Opus 5.5

  • overall performance matters — it scores 59.7 and ranks #1 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

  • cost matters — it's about 16.8x cheaper per token
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Claude Opus 5.5
Anthropic
Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
59.7
#1
21.1
#195
Reasoning
57.8
#1
21.1
#188
Coding
51.7
#1
12.3
#155
Agents
44.5
#2
5.3
#152
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
$4.00 / M
$0.30 / M
Output price
$20.00 / M
$1.00 / M
Context window
1,000,000
262,144

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Claude Opus 5.5
Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct
Tool use
32.9#2
12.5#107
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

31 reported for Claude Opus 5.5 · 10 for Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

1 shared

Claude Opus 5.5 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (SWE-bench Multilingual), while Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude Opus 5.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct costs less

For input processing, Claude Opus 5.5 ($4.00/1M tokens) is 13.3x more expensive than Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct ($0.30/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude Opus 5.5 ($20.00/1M tokens) is 20.0x more expensive than Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct ($1.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude Opus 5.5 is more expensive than Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude Opus 5.5
Input tokens$4.00
Output tokens$20.00
Best providerAnthropic
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct
Input tokens$0.30
Output tokens$1.00
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Claude Opus 5.5 accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct's 262,144 tokens. Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct can generate longer responses up to 262,144 tokens, while Claude Opus 5.5 is limited to 128,000 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude Opus 5.5
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Claude Opus 5.5 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct does not.

Claude Opus 5.5 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude Opus 5.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude Opus 5.5 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude Opus 5.5

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Opus 5.5 was released on 2026-09-22, while Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct was released on 2025-01-31.

Claude Opus 5.5 is 20 months newer than Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct.

Claude Opus 5.5

Sep 22, 2026

0 days ago

1.6yr newer
Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

Jan 31, 2025

1.6 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Claude Opus 5.5 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-06-01, while Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Claude Opus 5.5's training data extends to 2026-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct's cutoff date.

Claude Opus 5.5

Jun 2026

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

—

Provider Availability

Claude Opus 5.5 is available from Anthropic. Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct is available from DeepInfra.

Claude Opus 5.5

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $4.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $20.00/1M

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude Opus 5.5 and Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude Opus 5.5
✓ Preferred
Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Opus 5.5 vs Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct.

Which is better, Claude Opus 5.5 or Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct?

Claude Opus 5.5 leads the LLM Stats Score 59.7 to 21.1. Claude Opus 5.5 is made by Anthropic and Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude Opus 5.5 compare to Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct in benchmarks?

Claude Opus 5.5 scores BenchCAD (with Python tool): 96.2%, Global-MMLU: 94.3%, SWE-bench Multilingual: 93.9%, MILU: 93.1%, ArXivMath: 91.2%. Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct scores TAU-bench Retail: 77.5%, SWE-Bench Verified: 69.6%, BFCL-v3: 68.7%, Aider-Polyglot: 61.8%, TAU-bench Airline: 60.0%.

Is Claude Opus 5.5 cheaper than Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct?

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct is 13.3x cheaper for input tokens. Claude Opus 5.5 costs $4.00/M input and $20.00/M output via anthropic. Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct costs $0.30/M input and $1.00/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Opus 5.5 and Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct?

Claude Opus 5.5 supports 1.0M tokens and Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Opus 5.5 and Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (59.7 vs 21.1), context window (1.0M vs 262K), input pricing ($4.00 vs $0.30/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Opus 5.5 and Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct?

Claude Opus 5.5 is developed by Anthropic and Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons