The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct

Claude Opus 5.5 leads the LLM Stats Score 59.7 to 20.1. Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct is 23.4x cheaper per token.

Anthropic · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude Opus 5.5 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 59.7 to 20.1, ranking #1 overall.

On price, Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct is roughly 23.4x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Claude Opus 5.5 also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude Opus 5.5

  • overall performance matters — it scores 59.7 and ranks #1 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct

  • cost matters — it's about 23.4x cheaper per token
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Claude Opus 5.5
Anthropic
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
59.7
#1
20.1
#203
Reasoning
57.8
#1
19.9
#198
Coding
51.7
#1
1.8
#234
Agents
44.5
#2
8.2
#139
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$4.00 / M
$0.09 / M
Output price
$20.00 / M
$1.10 / M
Context window
1,000,000
262,144

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
Claude Opus 5.5
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct
Math
42.5#5
20.6#157
Tool use
32.9#2
4.2#163
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

31 reported for Claude Opus 5.5 · 24 for Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct

No common benchmarks found

Claude Opus 5.5 and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instructdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct costs less

For input processing, Claude Opus 5.5 ($4.00/1M tokens) is 44.4x more expensive than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct ($0.09/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude Opus 5.5 ($20.00/1M tokens) is 18.2x more expensive than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct ($1.10/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude Opus 5.5 is more expensive than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Wed Sep 23 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude Opus 5.5
Input tokens$4.00
Output tokens$20.00
Best providerAnthropic
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct
Input tokens$0.09
Output tokens$1.10
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Claude Opus 5.5 accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct's 262,144 tokens. Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct can generate longer responses up to 262,144 tokens, while Claude Opus 5.5 is limited to 128,000 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude Opus 5.5
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Wed Sep 23 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Claude Opus 5.5 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct does not.

Claude Opus 5.5 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude Opus 5.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude Opus 5.5 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude Opus 5.5

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Opus 5.5 was released on 2026-09-22, while Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct was released on 2025-09-10.

Claude Opus 5.5 is 13 months newer than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct.

Claude Opus 5.5

Sep 22, 2026

0 days ago

1.0yr newer
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct

Sep 10, 2025

1.0 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Claude Opus 5.5 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-06-01, while Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Claude Opus 5.5's training data extends to 2026-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct's cutoff date.

Claude Opus 5.5

Jun 2026

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct

—

Provider Availability

Claude Opus 5.5 is available from Anthropic. Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct is available from DeepInfra, Novita.

Claude Opus 5.5

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $4.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $20.00/1M

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.09/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.10/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.50/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude Opus 5.5 and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude Opus 5.5
✓ Preferred
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Opus 5.5 vs Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct.

Which is better, Claude Opus 5.5 or Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct?

Claude Opus 5.5 leads the LLM Stats Score 59.7 to 20.1. Claude Opus 5.5 is made by Anthropic and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude Opus 5.5 compare to Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct in benchmarks?

Claude Opus 5.5 scores BenchCAD (with Python tool): 96.2%, Global-MMLU: 94.3%, SWE-bench Multilingual: 93.9%, MILU: 93.1%, ArXivMath: 91.2%. Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct scores MMLU-Redux: 90.9%, MultiPL-E: 87.8%, IFEval: 87.6%, WritingBench: 87.3%, Creative Writing v3: 85.3%.

Is Claude Opus 5.5 cheaper than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct?

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct is 44.4x cheaper for input tokens. Claude Opus 5.5 costs $4.00/M input and $20.00/M output via anthropic. Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct costs $0.09/M input and $1.10/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Opus 5.5 and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct?

Claude Opus 5.5 supports 1.0M tokens and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Opus 5.5 and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (59.7 vs 20.1), context window (1.0M vs 262K), input pricing ($4.00 vs $0.09/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Opus 5.5 and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct?

Claude Opus 5.5 is developed by Anthropic and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons