The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Sarvam-105B

Claude Opus 5.5 leads the LLM Stats Score 60.3 to 25.7.

Anthropic · Sarvam AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude Opus 5.5 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 60.3 to 25.7, ranking #1 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude Opus 5.5

  • overall performance matters — it scores 60.3 and ranks #1 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Sarvam-105B

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Claude Opus 5.5
Anthropic
Sarvam-105B
Sarvam AI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
60.3
#1
25.7
#162
Reasoning
58.4
#1
26.1
#156
Coding
51.4
#1
-1.6
#256
Agents
45.7
#2
5.5
#153
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$4.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$20.00 / M
— / M
Context window
1,000,000
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Claude Opus 5.5
Sarvam-105B
Math
42.7#4
29.1#90
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

31 reported for Claude Opus 5.5 · 14 for Sarvam-105B

No common benchmarks found

Claude Opus 5.5 and Sarvam-105Bdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude Opus 5.5 specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only Claude Opus 5.5 specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude Opus 5.5
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Sarvam AI
Sarvam-105B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Fri Oct 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Claude Opus 5.5 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Sarvam-105B does not.

Claude Opus 5.5 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude Opus 5.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Sarvam-105B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude Opus 5.5 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Sarvam-105B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude Opus 5.5

Proprietary

Closed source

Sarvam-105B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Opus 5.5 was released on 2026-09-22, while Sarvam-105B was released on 2026-03-06.

Claude Opus 5.5 is 7 months newer than Sarvam-105B.

Claude Opus 5.5

Sep 22, 2026

1 weeks ago

6mo newer
Sarvam-105B

Mar 6, 2026

7 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Claude Opus 5.5 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-06-01, while Sarvam-105B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Claude Opus 5.5's training data extends to 2026-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Sarvam-105B's cutoff date.

Claude Opus 5.5

Jun 2026

Sarvam-105B

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude Opus 5.5 and Sarvam-105B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude Opus 5.5
✓ Preferred
Sarvam-105B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Opus 5.5 vs Sarvam-105B.

Which is better, Claude Opus 5.5 or Sarvam-105B?

Claude Opus 5.5 leads the LLM Stats Score 60.3 to 25.7. Claude Opus 5.5 is made by Anthropic and Sarvam-105B is made by Sarvam AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude Opus 5.5 compare to Sarvam-105B in benchmarks?

Claude Opus 5.5 scores BenchCAD (with Python tool): 96.2%, Global-MMLU: 94.3%, SWE-bench Multilingual: 93.9%, MILU: 93.1%, ArXivMath: 91.2%. Sarvam-105B scores MATH-500: 98.6%, AIME 2025: 96.7%, MMLU: 90.6%, HMMT 2025: 85.8%, HMMT25: 85.8%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Opus 5.5 and Sarvam-105B?

Claude Opus 5.5 supports 1.0M tokens and Sarvam-105B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Opus 5.5 and Sarvam-105B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (60.3 vs 25.7), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Opus 5.5 and Sarvam-105B?

Claude Opus 5.5 is developed by Anthropic and Sarvam-105B is developed by Sarvam AI.

Related comparisons