The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-4

Claude Opus 5 leads the LLM Stats Score 54.6 to 3.0. Claude Opus 5 is 3.8x cheaper per token.

Anthropic · OpenAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude Opus 5 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 54.6 to 3.0, ranking #5 overall.

On price, Claude Opus 5 is roughly 3.8x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Claude Opus 5 also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude Opus 5

  • overall performance matters — it scores 54.6 and ranks #5 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • cost matters — it's about 3.8x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2026

Choose GPT-4

  • you want predictable pricing at $30.00/M input and $60.00/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
54.6
#5
3.0
#310
53.6
#4
3.0
#302
42.0
#9
-5.2
#260
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
Input price
$5.00 / M
$30.00 / M
Output price
$25.00 / M
$60.00 / M
Context window
1,000,000
32,768

Individual benchmarks

13 reported for Claude Opus 5 · 12 for GPT-4

No common benchmarks found

Claude Opus 5 and GPT-4don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Claude Opus 5 costs less

For input processing, Claude Opus 5 ($5.00/1M tokens) is 6.0x cheaper than GPT-4 ($30.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude Opus 5 ($25.00/1M tokens) is 2.4x cheaper than GPT-4 ($60.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GPT-4 is more expensive than Claude Opus 5.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude Opus 5
Input tokens$5.00
Output tokens$25.00
Best providerAnthropic
OpenAI
GPT-4
Input tokens$30.00
Output tokens$60.00
Best providerAzure
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Claude Opus 5 accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to GPT-4's 32,768 tokens. Claude Opus 5 can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while GPT-4 is limited to 32,768 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude Opus 5
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
OpenAI
GPT-4
Input32,768 tokens
Output32,768 tokens
Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Claude Opus 5 and GPT-4 support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude Opus 5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GPT-4

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude Opus 5

Proprietary

Closed source

GPT-4

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Opus 5 was released on 2026-07-24, while GPT-4 was released on 2023-06-13.

Claude Opus 5 is 38 months newer than GPT-4.

Claude Opus 5

Jul 24, 2026

1 months ago

3.1yr newer
GPT-4

Jun 13, 2023

3.3 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-4 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2022-12-31, while Claude Opus 5's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm GPT-4's training data extends to 2022-12-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Claude Opus 5's cutoff date.

Claude Opus 5

GPT-4

Dec 2022

Provider Availability

Claude Opus 5 is available from Anthropic, DeepInfra. GPT-4 is available from Azure, OpenAI.

Claude Opus 5

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $5.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $25.00/1M
deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $5.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $25.00/1M

GPT-4

azure logo
Azure
Input Price:Input: $30.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $60.00/1M
openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $30.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $60.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude Opus 5 and GPT-4 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude Opus 5
✓ Preferred
GPT-4
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-4.

Which is better, Claude Opus 5 or GPT-4?

Claude Opus 5 leads the LLM Stats Score 54.6 to 3.0. Claude Opus 5 is made by Anthropic and GPT-4 is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude Opus 5 compare to GPT-4 in benchmarks?

Claude Opus 5 scores BrowseComp: 90.8%, BioMysteryBench: 90.1%, OSWorld 2.0: 70.6%, DeepSWE 1.1: 68.8%, Humanity's Last Exam: 64.7%. GPT-4 scores AI2 Reasoning Challenge (ARC): 96.3%, HellaSwag: 95.3%, Uniform Bar Exam: 90.0%, SAT Math: 89.0%, LSAT: 88.0%.

Is Claude Opus 5 cheaper than GPT-4?

Claude Opus 5 is 6.0x cheaper for input tokens. Claude Opus 5 costs $5.00/M input and $25.00/M output via anthropic. GPT-4 costs $30.00/M input and $60.00/M output via azure.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Opus 5 and GPT-4?

Claude Opus 5 supports 1.0M tokens and GPT-4 supports 33K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Opus 5 and GPT-4?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (54.6 vs 3.0), context window (1.0M vs 33K), input pricing ($5.00 vs $30.00/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Opus 5 and GPT-4?

Claude Opus 5 is developed by Anthropic and GPT-4 is developed by OpenAI.