Model Comparison
Claude Opus 5 vs GPT OSS 120BWhich is better in 2026?
Claude Opus 5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. GPT OSS 120B is 55.6x cheaper per token.
Verdict: Claude Opus 5 vs GPT OSS 120B — which is better?
Claude Opus 5 (by Anthropic) and GPT OSS 120B (by OpenAI) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.
Claude Opus 5 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (Humanity's Last Exam), while GPT OSS 120B is better at 0 benchmarks. Claude Opus 5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
On price, GPT OSS 120B is roughly 55.6x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Claude Opus 5 also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Choose Claude Opus 5 if…
- you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2026
Choose GPT OSS 120B if…
- cost matters — it's about 55.6x cheaper per token
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Claude Opus 5 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (Humanity's Last Exam), while GPT OSS 120B is better at 0 benchmarks.
Claude Opus 5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Claude Opus 5 ($5.00/1M tokens) is 55.6x more expensive than GPT OSS 120B ($0.09/1M tokens).
For output processing, Claude Opus 5 ($25.00/1M tokens) is 55.6x more expensive than GPT OSS 120B ($0.45/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Claude Opus 5 is more expensive than GPT OSS 120B.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Claude Opus 5 accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to GPT OSS 120B's 131,072 tokens. GPT OSS 120B can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while Claude Opus 5 is limited to 128,000 tokens.
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Claude Opus 5 supports multimodal inputs, whereas GPT OSS 120B does not.
Claude Opus 5 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Claude Opus 5
GPT OSS 120B
License
Usage and distribution terms
Claude Opus 5 is licensed under a proprietary license, while GPT OSS 120B uses Apache 2.0.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Proprietary
Closed source
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Claude Opus 5 was released on 2026-07-24, while GPT OSS 120B was released on 2025-08-05.
Claude Opus 5 is 12 months newer than GPT OSS 120B.
Jul 24, 2026
1 days ago
11mo newerAug 5, 2025
11 months ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
Claude Opus 5 is available from Anthropic. GPT OSS 120B is available from DeepInfra, Novita, OpenAI, Fireworks, Groq.
Claude Opus 5
GPT OSS 120B
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Claude Opus 5
View detailsAnthropic
GPT OSS 120B
View detailsOpenAI
Detailed Comparison
Interactive Arena
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Claude Opus 5 and GPT OSS 120B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
| Feature |
|---|
FAQ
Common questions about Claude Opus 5 vs GPT OSS 120B.