Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3 30B A3B
Claude Opus 5 leads the LLM Stats Score 54.6 to 17.3. Qwen3 30B A3B is 66.7x cheaper per token.
Anthropic · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Claude Opus 5 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 54.6 to 17.3, ranking #5 overall.
On price, Qwen3 30B A3B is roughly 66.7x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Claude Opus 5 also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Claude Opus 5
- overall performance matters — it scores 54.6 and ranks #5 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2026
Choose Qwen3 30B A3B
- cost matters — it's about 66.7x cheaper per token
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Individual benchmarks
13 reported for Claude Opus 5 · 8 for Qwen3 30B A3B
Claude Opus 5 and Qwen3 30B A3Bdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Claude Opus 5 ($5.00/1M tokens) is 50.0x more expensive than Qwen3 30B A3B ($0.10/1M tokens).
For output processing, Claude Opus 5 ($25.00/1M tokens) is 83.3x more expensive than Qwen3 30B A3B ($0.30/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Claude Opus 5 is more expensive than Qwen3 30B A3B.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Claude Opus 5 accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to Qwen3 30B A3B's 128,000 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 128,000 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Claude Opus 5 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen3 30B A3B does not.
Claude Opus 5 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Claude Opus 5
Qwen3 30B A3B
License
Usage and distribution terms
Claude Opus 5 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3 30B A3B uses Apache 2.0.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Proprietary
Closed source
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Claude Opus 5 was released on 2026-07-24, while Qwen3 30B A3B was released on 2025-04-29.
Claude Opus 5 is 15 months newer than Qwen3 30B A3B.
Jul 24, 2026
2 months ago
1.2yr newerApr 29, 2025
1.4 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
Claude Opus 5 is available from Anthropic, DeepInfra. Qwen3 30B A3B is available from DeepInfra, Novita, Fireworks.
Claude Opus 5
Qwen3 30B A3B
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Claude Opus 5 and Qwen3 30B A3B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3 30B A3B.