Model Comparison
Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructWhich is better in 2026?
Comparing Claude Opus 5 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.
Verdict: Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct — which is better?
Claude Opus 5 (by Anthropic) and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.
On price, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct is roughly 16.7x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Claude Opus 5 also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Choose Claude Opus 5 if…
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2026
Choose Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct if…
- cost matters — it's about 16.7x cheaper per token
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Claude Opus 5 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instructdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Claude Opus 5 ($5.00/1M tokens) is 16.7x more expensive than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct ($0.30/1M tokens).
For output processing, Claude Opus 5 ($25.00/1M tokens) is 16.8x more expensive than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct ($1.49/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Claude Opus 5 is more expensive than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Claude Opus 5 accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct's 262,144 tokens. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct can generate longer responses up to 262,144 tokens, while Claude Opus 5 is limited to 128,000 tokens.
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Both Claude Opus 5 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Claude Opus 5
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
License
Usage and distribution terms
Claude Opus 5 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Proprietary
Closed source
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Claude Opus 5 was released on 2026-07-24, while Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct was released on 2025-09-22.
Claude Opus 5 is 10 months newer than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct.
Jul 24, 2026
1 days ago
10mo newerSep 22, 2025
10 months ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
Claude Opus 5 is available from Anthropic. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct is available from DeepInfra, Novita.
Claude Opus 5
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Claude Opus 5
View detailsAnthropic
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
View detailsAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Detailed Comparison
Interactive Arena
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Claude Opus 5 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
| Feature |
|---|
FAQ
Common questions about Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct.