Claude Sonnet 4 vs MiMo-V2-Flash Comparison

Comparing Claude Sonnet 4 and MiMo-V2-Flash across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

Claude Sonnet 4 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (Terminal-Bench), while MiMo-V2-Flash is better at 3 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA, SWE-Bench Verified).

MiMo-V2-Flash shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Sat Mar 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

MiMo-V2-Flash costs less

For input processing, Claude Sonnet 4 ($3.00/1M tokens) is 30.0x more expensive than MiMo-V2-Flash ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude Sonnet 4 ($15.00/1M tokens) is 50.0x more expensive than MiMo-V2-Flash ($0.30/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude Sonnet 4 is more expensive than MiMo-V2-Flash.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers

Sat Mar 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Claude Sonnet 4

Input tokens$3.00

Output tokens$15.00

Best providerAnthropic

MiMo-V2-Flash

Input tokens$0.10

Output tokens$0.30

Best providerXiaomi

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

MiMo-V2-Flash accepts 256,000 input tokens compared to Claude Sonnet 4's 200,000 tokens. Claude Sonnet 4 can generate longer responses up to 64,000 tokens, while MiMo-V2-Flash is limited to 16,384 tokens.

Claude Sonnet 4

Input200,000 tokens

Output64,000 tokens

MiMo-V2-Flash

Input256,000 tokens

Output16,384 tokens

Sat Mar 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Claude Sonnet 4 supports multimodal inputs, whereas MiMo-V2-Flash does not.

Claude Sonnet 4 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude Sonnet 4

Text

Images

Audio

Video

MiMo-V2-Flash

Text

Images

Audio

Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude Sonnet 4 is licensed under a proprietary license, while MiMo-V2-Flash uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude Sonnet 4

Proprietary

Closed source

MiMo-V2-Flash

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Sonnet 4 was released on 2025-05-22, while MiMo-V2-Flash was released on 2025-12-16.

MiMo-V2-Flash is 7 months newer than Claude Sonnet 4.

Claude Sonnet 4

May 22, 2025

9 months ago

MiMo-V2-Flash

Dec 16, 2025

2 months ago

6mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Claude Sonnet 4 is available from Anthropic, Bedrock, Google. MiMo-V2-Flash is available from Xiaomi. The availability of providers can affect quality of the model and reliability.