Model Comparison

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Mistral Small 4

Claude Sonnet 4.6 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Mistral Small 4 is 22.9x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

Claude Sonnet 4.6 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, MMMU-Pro), while Mistral Small 4 is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude Sonnet 4.6 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat May 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Mistral Small 4 costs less

For input processing, Claude Sonnet 4.6 ($3.00/1M tokens) is 20.0x more expensive than Mistral Small 4 ($0.15/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude Sonnet 4.6 ($15.00/1M tokens) is 25.0x more expensive than Mistral Small 4 ($0.60/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude Sonnet 4.6 is more expensive than Mistral Small 4.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat May 02 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Input tokens$3.00
Output tokens$15.00
Best providerAnthropic
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 4
Input tokens$0.15
Output tokens$0.60
Best providerMistral
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Mistral Small 4 accepts 256,000 input tokens compared to Claude Sonnet 4.6's 200,000 tokens. Mistral Small 4 can generate longer responses up to 256,000 tokens, while Claude Sonnet 4.6 is limited to 64,000 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Input200,000 tokens
Output64,000 tokens
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 4
Input256,000 tokens
Output256,000 tokens
Sat May 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Mistral Small 4 support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude Sonnet 4.6

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Mistral Small 4

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude Sonnet 4.6 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Mistral Small 4 uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude Sonnet 4.6

Proprietary

Closed source

Mistral Small 4

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Sonnet 4.6 was released on 2026-02-17, while Mistral Small 4 was released on 2026-03-16.

Mistral Small 4 is 1 month newer than Claude Sonnet 4.6.

Claude Sonnet 4.6

Feb 17, 2026

2 months ago

Mistral Small 4

Mar 16, 2026

1 months ago

3w newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Claude Sonnet 4.6 is available from Anthropic. Mistral Small 4 is available from Mistral AI.

Claude Sonnet 4.6

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M

Mistral Small 4

mistral logo
Mistral
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Anthropic
Higher GPQA score (89.9% vs 71.2%)
Higher MMMU-Pro score (75.6% vs 60.0%)
Mistral AI
Larger context window (256,000 tokens)
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 4

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Mistral Small 4.

Which is better, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or Mistral Small 4?

Claude Sonnet 4.6 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Claude Sonnet 4.6 is made by Anthropic and Mistral Small 4 is made by Mistral AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Claude Sonnet 4.6 compare to Mistral Small 4 in benchmarks?

Claude Sonnet 4.6 scores Tau2 Telecom: 97.9%, Tau2 Retail: 91.7%, GPQA: 89.9%, MMMLU: 89.3%, SWE-Bench Verified: 79.6%. Mistral Small 4 scores AIME 2025: 83.8%, MMLU-Pro: 78.0%, AA-LCR: 71.2%, GPQA: 71.2%, LiveCodeBench: 63.6%.

Is Claude Sonnet 4.6 cheaper than Mistral Small 4?

Mistral Small 4 is 20.0x cheaper for input tokens. Claude Sonnet 4.6 costs $3.00/M input and $15.00/M output via anthropic. Mistral Small 4 costs $0.15/M input and $0.60/M output via mistral.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Mistral Small 4?

Claude Sonnet 4.6 supports 200K tokens and Mistral Small 4 supports 256K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Mistral Small 4?

Key differences include context window (200K vs 256K), input pricing ($3.00 vs $0.15/M), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Mistral Small 4?

Claude Sonnet 4.6 is developed by Anthropic and Mistral Small 4 is developed by Mistral AI.