Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B Comparison
Comparing Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Claude Sonnet 4.6 outperforms in 6 benchmarks (BrowseComp, GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, MMMLU, SWE-Bench Verified, Terminal-Bench 2.0), while Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is better at 1 benchmark (MMMU-Pro).
Claude Sonnet 4.6 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
Cost data unavailable.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B specifies input context (262,144 tokens). Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B specifies output context (64,000 tokens).
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Both Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
License
Usage and distribution terms
Claude Sonnet 4.6 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3.5-122B-A10B uses Apache 2.0.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Proprietary
Closed source
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Claude Sonnet 4.6 was released on 2026-02-17, while Qwen3.5-122B-A10B was released on 2026-02-24.
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is 0 month newer than Claude Sonnet 4.6.
Feb 17, 2026
4 weeks ago
Feb 24, 2026
3 weeks ago
1w newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Claude Sonnet 4.6
View detailsAnthropic
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
View detailsAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Detailed Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|