Model Comparison
Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10BWhich is better in 2026?
Claude Sonnet 4.6 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is 5.5x cheaper per token.
Verdict: Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B — which is better?
Claude Sonnet 4.6 (by Anthropic) and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.
Claude Sonnet 4.6 outperforms in 6 benchmarks (BrowseComp, GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, MMMLU, SWE-Bench Verified, Terminal-Bench 2.0), while Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is better at 1 benchmark (MMMU-Pro). Claude Sonnet 4.6 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
On price, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is roughly 5.5x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B also accepts a larger context window (262,144 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Choose Claude Sonnet 4.6 if…
- you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 6 of 7 shared benchmarks
Choose Qwen3.5-122B-A10B if…
- cost matters — it's about 5.5x cheaper per token
- you process long inputs — it offers a 262,144 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Feb 2026
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Claude Sonnet 4.6 outperforms in 6 benchmarks (BrowseComp, GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, MMMLU, SWE-Bench Verified, Terminal-Bench 2.0), while Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is better at 1 benchmark (MMMU-Pro).
Claude Sonnet 4.6 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Claude Sonnet 4.6 ($3.00/1M tokens) is 7.5x more expensive than Qwen3.5-122B-A10B ($0.40/1M tokens).
For output processing, Claude Sonnet 4.6 ($15.00/1M tokens) is 4.7x more expensive than Qwen3.5-122B-A10B ($3.20/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Claude Sonnet 4.6 is more expensive than Qwen3.5-122B-A10B.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B accepts 262,144 input tokens compared to Claude Sonnet 4.6's 200,000 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 64,000 tokens.
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Both Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
License
Usage and distribution terms
Claude Sonnet 4.6 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3.5-122B-A10B uses Apache 2.0.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Proprietary
Closed source
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Claude Sonnet 4.6 was released on 2026-02-17, while Qwen3.5-122B-A10B was released on 2026-02-24.
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is 0 month newer than Claude Sonnet 4.6.
Feb 17, 2026
3 months ago
Feb 24, 2026
3 months ago
1w newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
Claude Sonnet 4.6 is available from Anthropic. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is available from Novita.
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Claude Sonnet 4.6
View detailsAnthropic
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
View detailsAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Detailed Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|
FAQ
Common questions about Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B.