The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Grok 4 Fast

Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads the LLM Stats Score 58.0 to 31.7. Grok 4 Fast is 14.5x cheaper per token.

Anthropic · xAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 58.0 to 31.7, ranking #3 overall.

On price, Grok 4 Fast is roughly 14.5x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Grok 4 Fast also accepts a larger context window (2,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude Sonnet 5.5

  • overall performance matters — it scores 58.0 and ranks #3 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Grok 4 Fast

  • cost matters — it's about 14.5x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 2,000,000 token context window

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
58.0
#3
31.7
#118
56.6
#3
30.7
#122
48.8
#2
18.1
#120
42.3
#3
3.0
#169
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$2.00 / M
$0.20 / M
Output price
$10.00 / M
$0.50 / M
Context window
1,000,000
2,000,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Grok 4 Fast
36.9#34
27.3#101
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

47 reported for Claude Sonnet 5.5 · 7 for Grok 4 Fast

No common benchmarks found

Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Grok 4 Fastdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Grok 4 Fast costs less

For input processing, Claude Sonnet 5.5 ($2.00/1M tokens) is 10.0x more expensive than Grok 4 Fast ($0.20/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude Sonnet 5.5 ($10.00/1M tokens) is 20.0x more expensive than Grok 4 Fast ($0.50/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude Sonnet 5.5 is more expensive than Grok 4 Fast.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri Oct 02 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Input tokens$2.00
Output tokens$10.00
Best providerAnthropic
xAI
Grok 4 Fast
Input tokens$0.20
Output tokens$0.50
Best providerxAI
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Grok 4 Fast accepts 2,000,000 input tokens compared to Claude Sonnet 5.5's 1,000,000 tokens. Claude Sonnet 5.5 can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while Grok 4 Fast is limited to 30,000 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
xAI
Grok 4 Fast
Input2,000,000 tokens
Output30,000 tokens
Fri Oct 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Grok 4 Fast support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude Sonnet 5.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Grok 4 Fast

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude Sonnet 5.5

Proprietary

Closed source

Grok 4 Fast

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Sonnet 5.5 was released on 2026-09-28, while Grok 4 Fast was released on 2025-08-28.

Claude Sonnet 5.5 is 13 months newer than Grok 4 Fast.

Claude Sonnet 5.5

Sep 28, 2026

3 days ago

1.1yr newer
Grok 4 Fast

Aug 28, 2025

1.1 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Claude Sonnet 5.5 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-06-01, while Grok 4 Fast's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Claude Sonnet 5.5's training data extends to 2026-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Grok 4 Fast's cutoff date.

Claude Sonnet 5.5

Jun 2026

Grok 4 Fast

—

Provider Availability

Claude Sonnet 5.5 is available from Anthropic. Grok 4 Fast is available from xAI.

Claude Sonnet 5.5

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $2.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $10.00/1M

Grok 4 Fast

xai logo
xAI
Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.50/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Grok 4 Fast side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude Sonnet 5.5
✓ Preferred
Grok 4 Fast
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Grok 4 Fast.

Which is better, Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Grok 4 Fast?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads the LLM Stats Score 58.0 to 31.7. Claude Sonnet 5.5 is made by Anthropic and Grok 4 Fast is made by xAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude Sonnet 5.5 compare to Grok 4 Fast in benchmarks?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores BenchCAD (with Python tool): 96.3%, ArXivMath (with tools): 95.2%, Global-MMLU: 92.1%, MILU: 91.6%, SWE-bench Multilingual: 90.3%. Grok 4 Fast scores SimpleQA: 95.0%, HMMT 2025: 93.3%, AIME 2025: 92.0%, GPQA: 85.7%, LiveCodeBench: 80.0%.

Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 cheaper than Grok 4 Fast?

Grok 4 Fast is 10.0x cheaper for input tokens. Claude Sonnet 5.5 costs $2.00/M input and $10.00/M output via anthropic. Grok 4 Fast costs $0.20/M input and $0.50/M output via xai.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Grok 4 Fast?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 supports 1.0M tokens and Grok 4 Fast supports 2.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Grok 4 Fast?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (58.0 vs 31.7), context window (1.0M vs 2.0M), input pricing ($2.00 vs $0.20/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Grok 4 Fast?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 is developed by Anthropic and Grok 4 Fast is developed by xAI.