Claude Sonnet 5 vs Solar Pro 4
Claude Sonnet 5 leads the LLM Stats Score 49.3 to 36.0. Solar Pro 4 is 7.6x cheaper per token.
Anthropic · Upstage · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Claude Sonnet 5 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 49.3 to 36.0, ranking #15 overall.
In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Claude Sonnet 5 wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
On price, Solar Pro 4 is roughly 7.6x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Claude Sonnet 5 also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Claude Sonnet 5
- overall performance matters — it scores 49.3 and ranks #15 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window
Choose Solar Pro 4
- cost matters — it's about 7.6x cheaper per token
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
22 reported for Claude Sonnet 5 · 9 for Solar Pro 4
Claude Sonnet 5 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (BrowseComp, SWE-Bench Verified), while Solar Pro 4 is better at 0 benchmarks.
Claude Sonnet 5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Claude Sonnet 5 ($2.00/1M tokens) is 6.7x more expensive than Solar Pro 4 ($0.30/1M tokens).
For output processing, Claude Sonnet 5 ($10.00/1M tokens) is 8.3x more expensive than Solar Pro 4 ($1.20/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Claude Sonnet 5 is more expensive than Solar Pro 4.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Claude Sonnet 5 accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to Solar Pro 4's 524,288 tokens. Solar Pro 4 can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while Claude Sonnet 5 is limited to 64,000 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Claude Sonnet 5 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Solar Pro 4 does not.
Claude Sonnet 5 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Claude Sonnet 5
Solar Pro 4
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.
Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.
Proprietary
Closed source
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Claude Sonnet 5 was released on 2026-06-30, while Solar Pro 4 was released on 2026-08-06.
Solar Pro 4 is 1 month newer than Claude Sonnet 5.
Jun 30, 2026
1 months ago
Aug 6, 2026
3 weeks ago
1mo newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
Claude Sonnet 5 is available from Anthropic. Solar Pro 4 is available from Upstage.
Claude Sonnet 5
Solar Pro 4
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Claude Sonnet 5 and Solar Pro 4 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Claude Sonnet 5 vs Solar Pro 4.