The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GLM-5.3 vs Solar Pro 4

GLM-5.3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Solar Pro 4 is 4.1x cheaper per token.

Zhipu AI · Upstage · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

GLM-5.3 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (Terminal-Bench 2.1), while Solar Pro 4 is better at 0 benchmarks. GLM-5.3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

On price, Solar Pro 4 is roughly 4.1x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

GLM-5.3 also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GLM-5.3

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

Choose Solar Pro 4

  • cost matters — it's about 4.1x cheaper per token

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
$1.40 / M
$0.30 / M
Output price
$4.40 / M
$1.20 / M
Context window
1,000,000
524,288
Released
Aug 2026
Aug 2026
License
Unknown
Proprietary

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

GLM-5.3 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (Terminal-Bench 2.1), while Solar Pro 4 is better at 0 benchmarks.

GLM-5.3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Solar Pro 4 costs less

For input processing, GLM-5.3 ($1.40/1M tokens) is 4.7x more expensive than Solar Pro 4 ($0.30/1M tokens).

For output processing, GLM-5.3 ($4.40/1M tokens) is 3.7x more expensive than Solar Pro 4 ($1.20/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GLM-5.3 is more expensive than Solar Pro 4.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com
Zhipu AI
GLM-5.3
Input tokens$1.40
Output tokens$4.40
Best providerUnknown Organization
Upstage
Solar Pro 4
Input tokens$0.30
Output tokens$1.20
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

GLM-5.3 accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to Solar Pro 4's 524,288 tokens. Solar Pro 4 can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while GLM-5.3 is limited to 128,000 tokens.

Zhipu AI
GLM-5.3
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Upstage
Solar Pro 4
Input524,288 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GLM-5.3 was released on 2026-08-14, while Solar Pro 4 was released on 2026-08-06.

GLM-5.3 is 0 month newer than Solar Pro 4.

GLM-5.3

Aug 14, 2026

1 weeks ago

1w newer
Solar Pro 4

Aug 6, 2026

2 weeks ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

GLM-5.3 is available from ZAI. Solar Pro 4 is available from Upstage.

GLM-5.3

z logo
Unknown Organization
Input Price:Input: $1.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.40/1M

Solar Pro 4

upstage logo
Unknown Organization
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.20/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GLM-5.3 and Solar Pro 4 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GLM-5.3
✓ Preferred
Solar Pro 4
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GLM-5.3 vs Solar Pro 4.

Which is better, GLM-5.3 or Solar Pro 4?

GLM-5.3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. GLM-5.3 is made by Zhipu AI and Solar Pro 4 is made by Upstage. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does GLM-5.3 compare to Solar Pro 4 in benchmarks?

GLM-5.3 scores Terminal-Bench 2.1: 88.2%, CyberGym: 84.5%, FrontierSWE: 78.1%, Toolathlon: 73.0%, DeepSWE 1.1: 66.9%. Solar Pro 4 scores AIME 2026: 95.3%, GPQA: 89.0%, LiveCodeBench: 87.8%, MMLU-Pro: 86.3%, AA-LCR: 71.0%.

Is GLM-5.3 cheaper than Solar Pro 4?

Solar Pro 4 is 4.7x cheaper for input tokens. GLM-5.3 costs $1.40/M input and $4.40/M output via z. Solar Pro 4 costs $0.30/M input and $1.20/M output via upstage.

What are the context window sizes for GLM-5.3 and Solar Pro 4?

GLM-5.3 supports 1.0M tokens and Solar Pro 4 supports 524K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GLM-5.3 and Solar Pro 4?

Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 524K), input pricing ($1.40 vs $0.30/M), licensing (Unknown vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GLM-5.3 and Solar Pro 4?

GLM-5.3 is developed by Zhipu AI and Solar Pro 4 is developed by Upstage.