Model Comparison

Codestral-22B vs Gemma 3n E2BWhich is better in 2026?

Comparing Codestral-22B and Gemma 3n E2B across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Verdict: Codestral-22B vs Gemma 3n E2B — which is better?

Codestral-22B (by Mistral AI) and Gemma 3n E2B (by Google) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Choose Codestral-22B if…

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Gemma 3n E2B if…

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jun 2025
Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Codestral-22B and Gemma 3n E2Bdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

14.2B diff

Codestral-22B has 14.2B more parameters than Gemma 3n E2B, making it 177.5% larger.

Mistral AI
Codestral-22B
22.2Bparameters
Google
Gemma 3n E2B
8.0Bparameters
22.2B
Codestral-22B
8.0B
Gemma 3n E2B

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemma 3n E2B supports multimodal inputs, whereas Codestral-22B does not.

Gemma 3n E2B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Codestral-22B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemma 3n E2B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Codestral-22B is licensed under MNPL-0.1, while Gemma 3n E2B uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Codestral-22B

MNPL-0.1

Open weights

Gemma 3n E2B

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Codestral-22B was released on 2024-05-29, while Gemma 3n E2B was released on 2025-06-26.

Gemma 3n E2B is 13 months newer than Codestral-22B.

Codestral-22B

May 29, 2024

2.0 years ago

Gemma 3n E2B

Jun 26, 2025

11 months ago

1.1yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E2B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Codestral-22B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3n E2B's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Codestral-22B's cutoff date.

Codestral-22B

—

Gemma 3n E2B

Jun 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Mistral AI
Has open weights
Google
Supports multimodal inputs

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Mistral AI
Codestral-22B
Google
Gemma 3n E2B

FAQ

Common questions about Codestral-22B vs Gemma 3n E2B.

Which is better, Codestral-22B or Gemma 3n E2B?

Codestral-22B (Mistral AI) and Gemma 3n E2B (Google) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Codestral-22B compare to Gemma 3n E2B in benchmarks?

Codestral-22B scores HumanEvalFIM-Average: 91.6%, HumanEval: 81.1%, MBPP: 78.2%, Spider: 63.5%, HumanEval-Average: 61.5%. Gemma 3n E2B scores PIQA: 78.9%, BoolQ: 76.4%, ARC-E: 75.8%, HellaSwag: 72.2%, Winogrande: 66.8%.

What are the main differences between Codestral-22B and Gemma 3n E2B?

Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MNPL-0.1 vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Codestral-22B and Gemma 3n E2B?

Codestral-22B is developed by Mistral AI and Gemma 3n E2B is developed by Google.

Related comparisons