Model Comparison

Codestral-22B vs Gemma 3n E4B

Comparing Codestral-22B and Gemma 3n E4B across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Codestral-22B and Gemma 3n E4B don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

14.2B diff

Codestral-22B has 14.2B more parameters than Gemma 3n E4B, making it 177.5% larger.

Mistral AI
Codestral-22B
22.2Bparameters
Google
Gemma 3n E4B
8.0Bparameters
22.2B
Codestral-22B
8.0B
Gemma 3n E4B

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemma 3n E4B supports multimodal inputs, whereas Codestral-22B does not.

Gemma 3n E4B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Codestral-22B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemma 3n E4B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Codestral-22B is licensed under MNPL-0.1, while Gemma 3n E4B uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Codestral-22B

MNPL-0.1

Open weights

Gemma 3n E4B

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Codestral-22B was released on 2024-05-29, while Gemma 3n E4B was released on 2025-06-26.

Gemma 3n E4B is 13 months newer than Codestral-22B.

Codestral-22B

May 29, 2024

2.0 years ago

Gemma 3n E4B

Jun 26, 2025

10 months ago

1.1yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E4B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Codestral-22B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3n E4B's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Codestral-22B's cutoff date.

Codestral-22B

—

Gemma 3n E4B

Jun 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Mistral AI
Has open weights
Google
Supports multimodal inputs

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Mistral AI
Codestral-22B
Google
Gemma 3n E4B

FAQ

Common questions about Codestral-22B vs Gemma 3n E4B.

Which is better, Codestral-22B or Gemma 3n E4B?

Codestral-22B (Mistral AI) and Gemma 3n E4B (Google) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Codestral-22B compare to Gemma 3n E4B in benchmarks?

Codestral-22B scores HumanEvalFIM-Average: 91.6%, HumanEval: 81.1%, MBPP: 78.2%, Spider: 63.5%, HumanEval-Average: 61.5%. Gemma 3n E4B scores ARC-E: 81.6%, BoolQ: 81.6%, PIQA: 81.0%, HellaSwag: 78.6%, Winogrande: 71.7%.

What are the main differences between Codestral-22B and Gemma 3n E4B?

Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MNPL-0.1 vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Codestral-22B and Gemma 3n E4B?

Codestral-22B is developed by Mistral AI and Gemma 3n E4B is developed by Google.