Model Comparison

Codestral-22B vs Phi 4 Mini

Comparing Codestral-22B and Phi 4 Mini across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Codestral-22B and Phi 4 Mini don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Mar 31 2026 • llm-stats.com
Mistral AI
Codestral-22B
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Microsoft
Phi 4 Mini
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

18.4B diff

Codestral-22B has 18.4B more parameters than Phi 4 Mini, making it 478.1% larger.

Mistral AI
Codestral-22B
22.2Bparameters
Microsoft
Phi 4 Mini
3.8Bparameters
22.2B
Codestral-22B
3.8B
Phi 4 Mini

License

Usage and distribution terms

Codestral-22B is licensed under MNPL-0.1, while Phi 4 Mini uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Codestral-22B

MNPL-0.1

Open weights

Phi 4 Mini

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Codestral-22B was released on 2024-05-29, while Phi 4 Mini was released on 2025-02-01.

Phi 4 Mini is 8 months newer than Codestral-22B.

Codestral-22B

May 29, 2024

1.8 years ago

Phi 4 Mini

Feb 1, 2025

1.2 years ago

8mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Phi 4 Mini has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Codestral-22B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Phi 4 Mini's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Codestral-22B's cutoff date.

Codestral-22B

—

Phi 4 Mini

Jun 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Mistral AI
Microsoft

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Mistral AI
Codestral-22B
Microsoft
Phi 4 Mini

FAQ

Common questions about Codestral-22B vs Phi 4 Mini

Codestral-22B (Mistral AI) and Phi 4 Mini (Microsoft) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.
Codestral-22B scores HumanEvalFIM-Average: 91.6%, HumanEval: 81.1%, MBPP: 78.2%, Spider: 63.5%, HumanEval-Average: 61.5%. Phi 4 Mini scores GSM8k: 88.6%, ARC-C: 83.7%, BoolQ: 81.2%, OpenBookQA: 79.2%, PIQA: 77.6%.
Key differences include licensing (MNPL-0.1 vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Codestral-22B is developed by Mistral AI and Phi 4 Mini is developed by Microsoft.