Model Comparison

Command A+ vs DiffusionGemma 26B-A4BWhich is better in 2026?

Command A+ significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Verdict: Command A+ vs DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B — which is better?

Command A+ (by Cohere) and DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B (by Google) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Command A+ outperforms in 1 benchmarks (MMMU-Pro), while DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B is better at 0 benchmarks. Command A+ significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Choose Command A+ if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks

Choose DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B if…

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jun 2026

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

Command A+ outperforms in 1 benchmarks (MMMU-Pro), while DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B is better at 0 benchmarks.

Command A+ significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Jul 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

192.8B diff

Command A+ has 192.8B more parameters than DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B, making it 765.1% larger.

Cohere
Command A+
218.0Bparameters
Google
DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B
25.2Bparameters
218.0B
Command A+
25.2B
DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Command A+ and DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Command A+

Text
Images
Audio
Video

DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

Command A+

Apache 2.0

Open weights

DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Command A+ was released on 2026-05-20, while DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B was released on 2026-06-10.

DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B is 1 month newer than Command A+.

Command A+

May 20, 2026

1 months ago

DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B

Jun 10, 2026

1 months ago

3w newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-01, while Command A+'s cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B's training data extends to 2025-01-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Command A+'s cutoff date.

Command A+

DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B

Jan 2025

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Higher MMMU-Pro score (63.0% vs 54.3%)

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Command A+ and DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Command A+
✓ Preferred
DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Cohere
Command A+
Google
DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B

FAQ

Common questions about Command A+ vs DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B.

Which is better, Command A+ or DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B?

Command A+ significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Command A+ is made by Cohere and DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Command A+ compare to DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B in benchmarks?

Command A+ scores AIME 2025: 90.0%, CharXiv-D: 88.0%, MT-AIME 2025: 86.0%, Tau2 Telecom: 85.0%, WMT24++: 81.0%. DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B scores MMMLU: 81.5%, MMLU-Pro: 77.6%, GPQA: 73.2%, MathVision: 70.5%, AIME 2026: 69.1%.

Who makes Command A+ and DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B?

Command A+ is developed by Cohere and DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B is developed by Google.