Model Comparison

GLM-5 vs DiffusionGemma 26B-A4BWhich is better in 2026?

GLM-5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Verdict: GLM-5 vs DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B — which is better?

GLM-5 (by Zhipu AI) and DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B (by Google) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

GLM-5 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (t2-bench), while DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B is better at 0 benchmarks. GLM-5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Choose GLM-5 if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks

Choose DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B if…

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jun 2026

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

GLM-5 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (t2-bench), while DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B is better at 0 benchmarks.

GLM-5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed Jun 10 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

718.8B diff

GLM-5 has 718.8B more parameters than DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B, making it 2852.4% larger.

Zhipu AI
GLM-5
744.0Bparameters
Google
DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B
25.2Bparameters
744.0B
GLM-5
25.2B
DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only GLM-5 specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only GLM-5 specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Zhipu AI
GLM-5
Input200,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Google
DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Wed Jun 10 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B supports multimodal inputs, whereas GLM-5 does not.

DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

GLM-5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

GLM-5 is licensed under MIT, while DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

GLM-5

MIT

Open weights

DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GLM-5 was released on 2026-02-11, while DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B was released on 2026-06-10.

DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B is 4 months newer than GLM-5.

GLM-5

Feb 11, 2026

3 months ago

DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B

Jun 10, 2026

0 days ago

3mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-01, while GLM-5's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B's training data extends to 2025-01-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without GLM-5's cutoff date.

GLM-5

DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B

Jan 2025

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (200,000 tokens)
Higher t2-bench score (89.7% vs 56.2%)
Supports multimodal inputs

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Zhipu AI
GLM-5
Google
DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B

FAQ

Common questions about GLM-5 vs DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B.

Which is better, GLM-5 or DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B?

GLM-5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. GLM-5 is made by Zhipu AI and DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does GLM-5 compare to DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B in benchmarks?

GLM-5 scores t2-bench: 89.7%, SWE-Bench Verified: 77.8%, BrowseComp: 75.9%, MCP Atlas: 67.8%, Terminal-Bench 2.0: 56.2%. DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B scores MMMLU: 81.5%, MMLU-Pro: 77.6%, GPQA: 73.2%, MathVision: 70.5%, AIME 2026: 69.1%.

What are the context window sizes for GLM-5 and DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B?

GLM-5 supports 200K tokens and DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GLM-5 and DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B?

Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GLM-5 and DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B?

GLM-5 is developed by Zhipu AI and DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B is developed by Google.