The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Command A+ vs Gemini 4 Carbon

Gemini 4 Carbon leads the LLM Stats Score 59.0 to 23.5.

Cohere · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 4 Carbon leads the overall LLM Stats Score 59.0 to 23.5, ranking #2 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Command A+

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Gemini 4 Carbon

  • overall performance matters — it scores 59.0 and ranks #2 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Command A+
Cohere
Gemini 4 Carbon
Google
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
23.5
#201
59.0
#2
Reasoning
21.1
#211
54.9
#5
Coding
7.5
#215
48.1
#3
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
Command A+
Gemini 4 Carbon
Vision
12.2#125
36.0#12
Multimodal
15.6#105
38.0#6
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

15 reported for Command A+ · 16 for Gemini 4 Carbon

No common benchmarks found

Command A+ and Gemini 4 Carbondon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Command A+ and Gemini 4 Carbon support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Command A+

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemini 4 Carbon

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Command A+ is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Gemini 4 Carbon uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Command A+

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Gemini 4 Carbon

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Command A+ was released on 2026-05-20, while Gemini 4 Carbon was released on 2026-10-28.

Gemini 4 Carbon is 5 months newer than Command A+.

Command A+

May 20, 2026

5 months ago

Gemini 4 Carbon

Oct 28, 2026

1 days ago

5mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Command A+ and Gemini 4 Carbon side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Command A+
✓ Preferred
Gemini 4 Carbon
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Command A+ vs Gemini 4 Carbon.

Which is better, Command A+ or Gemini 4 Carbon?

Gemini 4 Carbon leads the LLM Stats Score 59.0 to 23.5. Command A+ is made by Cohere and Gemini 4 Carbon is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Command A+ compare to Gemini 4 Carbon in benchmarks?

Command A+ scores AIME 2025: 90.0%, CharXiv-D: 88.0%, MT-AIME 2025: 86.0%, Tau2 Telecom: 85.0%, WMT24++: 81.0%. Gemini 4 Carbon scores Gray Swan IPI Benchmark: 100.0%, Vending-Bench 2: 100.0%, Graphwalks BFS >128k: 96.2%, WebDev Arena: 88.4%, SEC-bench Pro: 88.2%.

What are the main differences between Command A+ and Gemini 4 Carbon?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (23.5 vs 59.0), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Command A+ and Gemini 4 Carbon?

Command A+ is developed by Cohere and Gemini 4 Carbon is developed by Google.

Related comparisons