Model Comparison

Command R+ vs DeepSeek-V3

DeepSeek-V3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Command R+ is 1.1x cheaper per token.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

Command R+ outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while DeepSeek-V3 is better at 1 benchmark (MMLU).

DeepSeek-V3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Apr 03 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Command R+ costs less

For input processing, Command R+ ($0.25/1M tokens) is 1.1x cheaper than DeepSeek-V3 ($0.27/1M tokens).

For output processing, Command R+ ($1.00/1M tokens) is 1.1x cheaper than DeepSeek-V3 ($1.10/1M tokens).

In conclusion, DeepSeek-V3 is more expensive than Command R+.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri Apr 03 2026 • llm-stats.com
Cohere
Command R+
Input tokens$0.25
Output tokens$1.00
Best providerCohere
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3
Input tokens$0.27
Output tokens$1.10
Best providerDeepSeek
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

567.0B diff

DeepSeek-V3 has 567.0B more parameters than Command R+, making it 545.2% larger.

Cohere
Command R+
104.0Bparameters
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3
671.0Bparameters
104.0B
Command R+
671.0B
DeepSeek-V3

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

DeepSeek-V3 accepts 131,072 input tokens compared to Command R+'s 128,000 tokens. DeepSeek-V3 can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while Command R+ is limited to 128,000 tokens.

Cohere
Command R+
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Fri Apr 03 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Command R+ is licensed under CC BY-NC, while DeepSeek-V3 uses MIT + Model License (Commercial use allowed).

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Command R+

CC BY-NC

Open weights

DeepSeek-V3

MIT + Model License (Commercial use allowed)

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Command R+ was released on 2024-08-30, while DeepSeek-V3 was released on 2024-12-25.

DeepSeek-V3 is 4 months newer than Command R+.

Command R+

Aug 30, 2024

1.6 years ago

DeepSeek-V3

Dec 25, 2024

1.3 years ago

3mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Command R+ is available from Cohere, Bedrock. DeepSeek-V3 is available from DeepSeek.

Command R+

cohere logo
Cohere
Input Price:Input: $0.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.00/1M
bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M

DeepSeek-V3

deepseek logo
DeepSeek
Input Price:Input: $0.27/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.10/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Larger context window (131,072 tokens)
Higher MMLU score (88.5% vs 75.7%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Cohere
Command R+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3

FAQ

Common questions about Command R+ vs DeepSeek-V3

DeepSeek-V3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Command R+ is made by Cohere and DeepSeek-V3 is made by DeepSeek. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Command R+ scores HellaSwag: 88.6%, Winogrande: 85.4%, MMLU: 75.7%, ARC-C: 71.0%, GSM8k: 70.7%. DeepSeek-V3 scores DROP: 91.6%, CLUEWSC: 90.9%, MATH-500: 90.2%, MMLU-Redux: 89.1%, MMLU: 88.5%.
Command R+ is 1.1x cheaper for input tokens. Command R+ costs $0.25/M input and $1.00/M output via cohere. DeepSeek-V3 costs $0.27/M input and $1.10/M output via deepseek.
Command R+ supports 128K tokens and DeepSeek-V3 supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include context window (128K vs 131K), input pricing ($0.25 vs $0.27/M), licensing (CC BY-NC vs MIT + Model License (Commercial use allowed)). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Command R+ is developed by Cohere and DeepSeek-V3 is developed by DeepSeek.