The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Command R+ vs IBM Granite 4.2 30B

IBM Granite 4.2 30B leads the LLM Stats Score 24.0 to -0.1.

Cohere · IBM · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B leads the overall LLM Stats Score 24.0 to -0.1, ranking #156 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Command R+

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.25/M input and $1.00/M output

Choose IBM Granite 4.2 30B

  • overall performance matters — it scores 24.0 and ranks #156 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Command R+
Cohere
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
IBM
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
-0.1
#310
24.0
#156
Reasoning
-0.4
#306
21.8
#165
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.25 / M
— / M
Output price
$1.00 / M
— / M
Context window
128,000
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Command R+
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
Math
-1.7#297
25.6#103
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

6 reported for Command R+ · 18 for IBM Granite 4.2 30B

No common benchmarks found

Command R+ and IBM Granite 4.2 30Bdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

74.0B diff

Command R+ has 74.0B more parameters than IBM Granite 4.2 30B, making it 246.7% larger.

Cohere
Command R+
104.0Bparameters
IBM
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
30.0Bparameters
104.0B
Command R+
30.0B
IBM Granite 4.2 30B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Command R+ specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Command R+ specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Cohere
Command R+
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
IBM
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Aug 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Command R+ is licensed under CC BY-NC, while IBM Granite 4.2 30B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Command R+

CC BY-NC

Open weights

IBM Granite 4.2 30B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Command R+ was released on 2024-08-30, while IBM Granite 4.2 30B was released on 2026-08-25.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B is 24 months newer than Command R+.

Command R+

Aug 30, 2024

2.0 years ago

IBM Granite 4.2 30B

Aug 25, 2026

6 days ago

2.0yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Command R+ and IBM Granite 4.2 30B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Command R+
✓ Preferred
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Command R+ vs IBM Granite 4.2 30B.

Which is better, Command R+ or IBM Granite 4.2 30B?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B leads the LLM Stats Score 24.0 to -0.1. Command R+ is made by Cohere and IBM Granite 4.2 30B is made by IBM. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Command R+ compare to IBM Granite 4.2 30B in benchmarks?

Command R+ scores HellaSwag: 88.6%, Winogrande: 85.4%, MMLU: 75.7%, ARC-C: 71.0%, GSM8k: 70.7%. IBM Granite 4.2 30B scores RULER 64k: 90.0%, AIME 2025: 89.2%, HMMT25: 89.2%, RULER 128k: 81.4%, MMLU-Pro: 77.6%.

What are the context window sizes for Command R+ and IBM Granite 4.2 30B?

Command R+ supports 128K tokens and IBM Granite 4.2 30B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Command R+ and IBM Granite 4.2 30B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-0.1 vs 24.0), licensing (CC BY-NC vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Command R+ and IBM Granite 4.2 30B?

Command R+ is developed by Cohere and IBM Granite 4.2 30B is developed by IBM.

Related comparisons