Model Comparison

Command R+ vs Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Comparing Command R+ and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Command R+ and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite costs less

For input processing, Command R+ ($0.25/1M tokens) is 2.5x more expensive than Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, Command R+ ($1.00/1M tokens) is 2.5x more expensive than Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite ($0.40/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Command R+ is more expensive than Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri May 15 2026 • llm-stats.com
Cohere
Command R+
Input tokens$0.25
Output tokens$1.00
Best providerCohere
Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.40
Best providerGoogle
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Command R+'s 128,000 tokens. Command R+ can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is limited to 65,536 tokens.

Cohere
Command R+
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Fri May 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite supports multimodal inputs, whereas Command R+ does not.

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Command R+

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Command R+ is licensed under CC BY-NC, while Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite uses Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Command R+

CC BY-NC

Open weights

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Command R+ was released on 2024-08-30, while Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite was released on 2025-06-17.

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is 10 months newer than Command R+.

Command R+

Aug 30, 2024

1.7 years ago

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Jun 17, 2025

11 months ago

9mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-01, while Command R+'s cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite's training data extends to 2025-01-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Command R+'s cutoff date.

Command R+

—

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Jan 2025

Provider Availability

Command R+ is available from Cohere, Bedrock. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is available from Google.

Command R+

cohere logo
Cohere
Input Price:Input: $0.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.00/1M
bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.40/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Cohere

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

Google
Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Cohere
Command R+
Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

FAQ

Common questions about Command R+ vs Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite.

Which is better, Command R+ or Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite?

Command R+ (Cohere) and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite (Google) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Command R+ compare to Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite in benchmarks?

Command R+ scores HellaSwag: 88.6%, Winogrande: 85.4%, MMLU: 75.7%, ARC-C: 71.0%, GSM8k: 70.7%. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite scores FACTS Grounding: 84.1%, Global-MMLU-Lite: 81.1%, MMMU: 72.9%, GPQA: 64.6%, Vibe-Eval: 51.3%.

Is Command R+ cheaper than Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is 2.5x cheaper for input tokens. Command R+ costs $0.25/M input and $1.00/M output via cohere. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite costs $0.10/M input and $0.40/M output via google.

What are the context window sizes for Command R+ and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite?

Command R+ supports 128K tokens and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Command R+ and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite?

Key differences include context window (128K vs 1.0M), input pricing ($0.25 vs $0.10/M), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (CC BY-NC vs Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Command R+ and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite?

Command R+ is developed by Cohere and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is developed by Google.