The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Command R+ vs GPT-4o

GPT-4o significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Command R+ is 10.0x cheaper per token.

Cohere · OpenAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Command R+ outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while GPT-4o is better at 1 benchmark (MMLU). GPT-4o significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

On price, Command R+ is roughly 10.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Command R+

  • cost matters — it's about 10.0x cheaper per token
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2024
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose GPT-4o

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
$0.25 / M
$2.50 / M
Output price
$1.00 / M
$10.00 / M
Context window
128,000
128,000
Released
Aug 2024
Aug 2024
License
CC BY-NC
Proprietary

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

Command R+ outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while GPT-4o is better at 1 benchmark (MMLU).

GPT-4o significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed Aug 26 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Command R+ costs less

For input processing, Command R+ ($0.25/1M tokens) is 10.0x cheaper than GPT-4o ($2.50/1M tokens).

For output processing, Command R+ ($1.00/1M tokens) is 10.0x cheaper than GPT-4o ($10.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GPT-4o is more expensive than Command R+.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Wed Aug 26 2026 • llm-stats.com
Cohere
Command R+
Input tokens$0.25
Output tokens$1.00
Best providerCohere
OpenAI
GPT-4o
Input tokens$2.50
Output tokens$10.00
Best providerAzure
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Both models have the same input context window of 128,000 tokens. Command R+ can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while GPT-4o is limited to 16,384 tokens.

Cohere
Command R+
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
OpenAI
GPT-4o
Input128,000 tokens
Output16,384 tokens
Wed Aug 26 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

GPT-4o supports multimodal inputs, whereas Command R+ does not.

GPT-4o can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Command R+

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GPT-4o

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Command R+ is licensed under CC BY-NC, while GPT-4o uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Command R+

CC BY-NC

Open weights

GPT-4o

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Command R+ was released on 2024-08-30, while GPT-4o was released on 2024-08-06.

Command R+ is 1 month newer than GPT-4o.

Command R+

Aug 30, 2024

2.0 years ago

3w newer
GPT-4o

Aug 6, 2024

2.1 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Command R+ is available from Cohere, Bedrock. GPT-4o is available from Azure, OpenAI.

Command R+

cohere logo
Cohere
Input Price:Input: $0.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.00/1M
bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M

GPT-4o

azure logo
Azure
Input Price:Input: $2.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $10.00/1M
openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $2.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $10.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Command R+ and GPT-4o side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Command R+
✓ Preferred
GPT-4o
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Command R+ vs GPT-4o.

Which is better, Command R+ or GPT-4o?

GPT-4o significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Command R+ is made by Cohere and GPT-4o is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Command R+ compare to GPT-4o in benchmarks?

Command R+ scores HellaSwag: 88.6%, Winogrande: 85.4%, MMLU: 75.7%, ARC-C: 71.0%, GSM8k: 70.7%. GPT-4o scores AI2D: 94.2%, DocVQA: 92.8%, ChartQA: 85.7%, MMLU: 85.7%, CharXiv-D: 85.3%.

Is Command R+ cheaper than GPT-4o?

Command R+ is 10.0x cheaper for input tokens. Command R+ costs $0.25/M input and $1.00/M output via cohere. GPT-4o costs $2.50/M input and $10.00/M output via azure.

What are the context window sizes for Command R+ and GPT-4o?

Command R+ supports 128K tokens and GPT-4o supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Command R+ and GPT-4o?

Key differences include input pricing ($0.25 vs $2.50/M), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (CC BY-NC vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Command R+ and GPT-4o?

Command R+ is developed by Cohere and GPT-4o is developed by OpenAI.