Model Comparison

Command R+ vs GPT OSS 120BWhich is better in 2026?

GPT OSS 120B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. GPT OSS 120B is 2.4x cheaper per token.

Verdict: Command R+ vs GPT OSS 120B — which is better?

Command R+ (by Cohere) and GPT OSS 120B (by OpenAI) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Command R+ outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while GPT OSS 120B is better at 1 benchmark (MMLU). GPT OSS 120B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

On price, GPT OSS 120B is roughly 2.4x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

GPT OSS 120B also accepts a larger context window (131,072 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose Command R+ if…

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.25/M input and $1.00/M output

Choose GPT OSS 120B if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks
  • cost matters — it's about 2.4x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 131,072 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2025

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

Command R+ outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while GPT OSS 120B is better at 1 benchmark (MMLU).

GPT OSS 120B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Jul 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

GPT OSS 120B costs less

For input processing, Command R+ ($0.25/1M tokens) is 2.8x more expensive than GPT OSS 120B ($0.09/1M tokens).

For output processing, Command R+ ($1.00/1M tokens) is 2.2x more expensive than GPT OSS 120B ($0.45/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Command R+ is more expensive than GPT OSS 120B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Jul 21 2026 • llm-stats.com
Cohere
Command R+
Input tokens$0.25
Output tokens$1.00
Best providerCohere
OpenAI
GPT OSS 120B
Input tokens$0.09
Output tokens$0.45
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

12.8B diff

GPT OSS 120B has 12.8B more parameters than Command R+, making it 12.3% larger.

Cohere
Command R+
104.0Bparameters
OpenAI
GPT OSS 120B
116.8Bparameters
104.0B
Command R+
116.8B
GPT OSS 120B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

GPT OSS 120B accepts 131,072 input tokens compared to Command R+'s 128,000 tokens. GPT OSS 120B can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while Command R+ is limited to 128,000 tokens.

Cohere
Command R+
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
OpenAI
GPT OSS 120B
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Tue Jul 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Command R+ is licensed under CC BY-NC, while GPT OSS 120B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Command R+

CC BY-NC

Open weights

GPT OSS 120B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Command R+ was released on 2024-08-30, while GPT OSS 120B was released on 2025-08-05.

GPT OSS 120B is 11 months newer than Command R+.

Command R+

Aug 30, 2024

1.9 years ago

GPT OSS 120B

Aug 5, 2025

11 months ago

11mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Command R+ is available from Cohere, Bedrock. GPT OSS 120B is available from DeepInfra, Novita, OpenAI, Fireworks, Groq.

Command R+

cohere logo
Cohere
Input Price:Input: $0.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.00/1M
bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M

GPT OSS 120B

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.09/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.45/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.50/1M
openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.50/1M
fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M
groq logo
Groq
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Cohere

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

OpenAI
Larger context window (131,072 tokens)
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Higher MMLU score (90.0% vs 75.7%)

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Command R+ and GPT OSS 120B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Command R+
✓ Preferred
GPT OSS 120B
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Cohere
Command R+
OpenAI
GPT OSS 120B

FAQ

Common questions about Command R+ vs GPT OSS 120B.

Which is better, Command R+ or GPT OSS 120B?

GPT OSS 120B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Command R+ is made by Cohere and GPT OSS 120B is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Command R+ compare to GPT OSS 120B in benchmarks?

Command R+ scores HellaSwag: 88.6%, Winogrande: 85.4%, MMLU: 75.7%, ARC-C: 71.0%, GSM8k: 70.7%. GPT OSS 120B scores MMLU: 90.0%, CodeForces: 82.1%, GPQA: 80.1%, TAU-bench Retail: 67.8%, HealthBench: 57.6%.

Is Command R+ cheaper than GPT OSS 120B?

GPT OSS 120B is 2.8x cheaper for input tokens. Command R+ costs $0.25/M input and $1.00/M output via cohere. GPT OSS 120B costs $0.09/M input and $0.45/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Command R+ and GPT OSS 120B?

Command R+ supports 128K tokens and GPT OSS 120B supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Command R+ and GPT OSS 120B?

Key differences include context window (128K vs 131K), input pricing ($0.25 vs $0.09/M), licensing (CC BY-NC vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Command R+ and GPT OSS 120B?

Command R+ is developed by Cohere and GPT OSS 120B is developed by OpenAI.

Related comparisons