The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Command R+ vs Granite 3.3 8B Base

Command R+ and Granite 3.3 8B Base are closely matched at -0.2 and -0.3 on the LLM Stats Score.

Cohere · IBM · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Command R+ and Granite 3.3 8B Base are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at -0.2 and -0.3.

In the 6 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Command R+ wins 6; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Command R+

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 6 of 6 exact shared results

Choose Granite 3.3 8B Base

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Apr 2025

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
-0.2
#315
-0.3
#316
-0.5
#310
-0.5
#311
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
6 of 6
0 of 6
Input price
$0.25 / M
— / M
Output price
$1.00 / M
— / M
Context window
128,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
Command R+
Granite 3.3 8B Base
-1.7#299
-0.5#290
1.7#179
-6.8#209
1.7#168
-5.5#192
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

6 reported for Command R+ · 20 for Granite 3.3 8B Base

6 shared

Command R+ outperforms in 6 benchmarks (ARC-C, GSM8k, HellaSwag, MMLU, TruthfulQA, Winogrande), while Granite 3.3 8B Base is better at 0 benchmarks.

Command R+ significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Sep 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

95.8B diff

Command R+ has 95.8B more parameters than Granite 3.3 8B Base, making it 1172.9% larger.

Cohere
Command R+
104.0Bparameters
IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Base
8.2Bparameters
104.0B
Command R+
8.2B
Granite 3.3 8B Base

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Command R+ specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Command R+ specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Cohere
Command R+
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Base
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Sep 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Granite 3.3 8B Base supports multimodal inputs, whereas Command R+ does not.

Granite 3.3 8B Base can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Command R+

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Granite 3.3 8B Base

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Command R+ is licensed under CC BY-NC, while Granite 3.3 8B Base uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Command R+

CC BY-NC

Open weights

Granite 3.3 8B Base

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Command R+ was released on 2024-08-30, while Granite 3.3 8B Base was released on 2025-04-16.

Granite 3.3 8B Base is 8 months newer than Command R+.

Command R+

Aug 30, 2024

2.0 years ago

Granite 3.3 8B Base

Apr 16, 2025

1.4 years ago

7mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Granite 3.3 8B Base has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-04-01, while Command R+'s cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Granite 3.3 8B Base's training data extends to 2024-04-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Command R+'s cutoff date.

Command R+

Granite 3.3 8B Base

Apr 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Command R+ and Granite 3.3 8B Base side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Command R+
✓ Preferred
Granite 3.3 8B Base
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Command R+ vs Granite 3.3 8B Base.

Which is better, Command R+ or Granite 3.3 8B Base?

Command R+ and Granite 3.3 8B Base are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at -0.2 and -0.3. Command R+ is made by Cohere and Granite 3.3 8B Base is made by IBM. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Command R+ compare to Granite 3.3 8B Base in benchmarks?

Command R+ scores HellaSwag: 88.6%, Winogrande: 85.4%, MMLU: 75.7%, ARC-C: 71.0%, GSM8k: 70.7%. Granite 3.3 8B Base scores HumanEval: 89.7%, AttaQ: 88.5%, HumanEval+: 86.1%, AIME 2024: 81.2%, HellaSwag: 80.1%.

What are the context window sizes for Command R+ and Granite 3.3 8B Base?

Command R+ supports 128K tokens and Granite 3.3 8B Base supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Command R+ and Granite 3.3 8B Base?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-0.2 vs -0.3), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (CC BY-NC vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Command R+ and Granite 3.3 8B Base?

Command R+ is developed by Cohere and Granite 3.3 8B Base is developed by IBM.